Semantic Analysis by spaCy
inder Puri General Store and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Decided On : Mar-08-1991
Court : Jammu and Kashmir
LAW: the Partnership Act, Section 69, the Partnership Act, Constitution, Article 21 of the federal Constitution, Constitution, Article, Article 21, Constitution, Madras 205, Constitution, Article 38 of the Constitution, Article 19(a, Constitution, Article 21, Article 300(A, Constitution, Constitution
PERSON: Sethi, Sikh, Qamar, Addl, Tehsildar, Jammu, Articles 14, Chandrachud, Olga Tellis v., Douglas J., Munn, Kharak Singh v. State of U. P., Cri LJ 329, M. C. Mehta v. Union of India, Bhim Singh v. State, Sikh, R. Gandhi v. Union, J.
NORP: J.1, Hindu, Indian, Sikhs
GPE: Jammu, Jammu, Tehsil, Baksey, Field, Illinois, US, Bandhua Mukti Morcha, India
DATE: 13th January, 1989, 19, 1954, 1874, 1964, 1963, 1987, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1989
ORG: Sikh Community, State, The District Magistrate, Court, The State Govt, Committee, Asstt, Government, the Supreme Court, Bombay Municipal Corporation, AIR 1986, SC, MD 442, Court, AIR 1963 SC 1295, State, State, AIR 1987 SC 1086, Court, Union of India, AIR 1984 SC, the Supreme Court, SC, Union Carbide, the Supreme Court, State, State, State, State, Advocate General, State, State, State, Rulers, State, Coimbatore, AIR, State, State, the State List, State, the Supreme Court, AIR 1986, SC, the Sikh Community, Coimbatore, Bhag, State, the State of Tamil Nadu, the Collector of Coimbatore, argued.8
CARDINAL: 23, 21, 194, 347, 94, 332, 2, 194, 1, 395, 3, 161, 802, 4, 214.''The, 2, 500/-
PRODUCT: S/ Shri Harbans Lal, Article, 180, 180
FAC: Bombay Pavement Dweller's