Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

inder Puri General Store and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Decided On : Mar-08-1991

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

LAW: the Partnership Act, Section 69, the Partnership Act, Constitution, Article 21 of the federal Constitution, Constitution, Article, Article 21, Constitution, Madras 205, Constitution, Article 38 of the Constitution, Article 19(a, Constitution, Article 21, Article 300(A, Constitution, Constitution

PERSON: Sethi, Sikh, Qamar, Addl, Tehsildar, Jammu, Articles 14, Chandrachud, Olga Tellis v., Douglas J., Munn, Kharak Singh v. State of U. P., Cri LJ 329, M. C. Mehta v. Union of India, Bhim Singh v. State, Sikh, R. Gandhi v. Union, J.

NORP: J.1, Hindu, Indian, Sikhs

GPE: Jammu, Jammu, Tehsil, Baksey, Field, Illinois, US, Bandhua Mukti Morcha, India

DATE: 13th January, 1989, 19, 1954, 1874, 1964, 1963, 1987, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1989

ORG: Sikh Community, State, The District Magistrate, Court, The State Govt, Committee, Asstt, Government, the Supreme Court, Bombay Municipal Corporation, AIR 1986, SC, MD 442, Court, AIR 1963 SC 1295, State, State, AIR 1987 SC 1086, Court, Union of India, AIR 1984 SC, the Supreme Court, SC, Union Carbide, the Supreme Court, State, State, State, State, Advocate General, State, State, State, Rulers, State, Coimbatore, AIR, State, State, the State List, State, the Supreme Court, AIR 1986, SC, the Sikh Community, Coimbatore, Bhag, State, the State of Tamil Nadu, the Collector of Coimbatore, argued.8

CARDINAL: 23, 21, 194, 347, 94, 332, 2, 194, 1, 395, 3, 161, 802, 4, 214.''The, 2, 500/-

PRODUCT: S/ Shri Harbans Lal, Article, 180, 180

FAC: Bombay Pavement Dweller's

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //