Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mohd. AmIn Tyamboo

Decided On : Sep-11-1979

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

LAW: Section 23(2, the I.T. Act, Section 64, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 64, Section 64, Section 23(2, Chapter VIA, Section 64, Section 80B(5, Section 64, Section 23(2, Section 23(2, Section 64, Section 5, Section 80B(5, Chapter VIA, Section 2 of the Act, Section 5, Section 5, Section 6, Section 5, Section 5, Chapter VI-A and Section 280, Section 198, Section 64 of the Act, Section 280-O of the Act, Section 23, Section 64, Section 80B(5, Section 64, Chapter, Section 280, Section 64,'11, Section 5, Section 80B(5, Section 5, Section 80B(5

ORG: Mufti, ITO, AAC, ITO, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, AAC, Legislature, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Chap, Chap, including-(i, Chap, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, Act.10, Tribunal, Legislature, Tribunal

NORP: J.1

PERSON: Javeed Ahmad, J.13

DATE: the assessment year 1974-75, annual, 1961, ' 1, annual, ' 5, 45, ' 5, any previous year, such year, such year, such year, any previous year, such year, such year, 61, 86, 86A, 1970, under s 64

CARDINAL: 4,420, 2,638, 2, one-half, one thousand and, more than one, one, 6, 2, 6, 41(1, 41(4, 58, 69B, 198, 60, 92, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2

PERCENT: 10%

GPE: India, Clauses, Clause, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, negative.12

ORDINAL: first, second

MONEY: ten per cent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //