American Colortype Co. Vs. Continental Colortype Co.

Decided On : Jan-19-1903

Court : US Supreme Court

ORG: American Colortype Co., Continental Colortype Co., U.S. 104, U.S. Supreme Court, American Colortype Co., Continental Colortype Co., U.S. 104, American Colortype Company, Continental Colortype Company , U.S. 104, Syllabus, the Circuit Court, Court, the Circuit Court, the National Colortype Company, Three-Color Company, the Osborne Company, the National Colortype Company, the National Colortype Company, the National Colortype Company, Arkansas Valley Smelting Co., Belden Mining Co., Plant Investment Co., Tampa & Key West Ry., Thompson v. Perrine, Rechtslexicon

DATE: 1903, 1903, December 22, 1902, January 19, 1903, March 1, 1902, five years, December 1, 1901, ten years, two years, May 1, 1903, 152 U. S. 71, 106 U. S. 589, 8th ed

CARDINAL: 188, 440, 188, three, three, two, three, 371, 158, 396, 397, 344

GPE: Illinois, New Jersey, New Jersey, New Jersey, Illinois, New Jersey, the United States, Illinois, Illinois, Illinois, New Jersey, Illinois, Illinois, Illinois, Fierlein, Illinois, New Jersey, the United States, Mass, Jacksonville, Laws

LOC: the Northern District, the Northern District, the Rocky Mountains

PERSON: HOLMES, Schultz, Quetsch, Seibert, Maas, Fierlein, Maas, Fierlein, Fierlein, Schultz, Maas, Fierlein, Quetsch, Seibert, Schultz, Maas, Fierlein, Justice Story, Compare Abbott, Story, Schultz

NORP: Freese, American, Freese, Freese, Freese, Freese, Confl

QUANTITY: 3d ed

ORDINAL: third