Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

United States Vs. Mission Rock Co.

Decided On : Apr-13-1903

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: section 11, section 5 of the Act of July 1, 1864, section 11, section 11, Section 1, Section 2, section 4, section 5 of the Act of

GPE: United States, U.S., United States, U.S., United States, U.S., The State of California, Shively, The State of California, San Francisco Bay, The United States, the United States, the United States, California, the United States, Mission Rock, the State of California, the State of California Page, the City of San Francisco, the State of California, the City of, San Francisco, the State of California, the United States, California, the United States, the State of California, the State of California, the City and County of, San Francisco, California, the State of California, Tichenor, the United States, California, the State of California, the City and County of, San Francisco, California, Shively v. Bowlby, California, the United States, Mexico, California, Shively, Shively, California, California, California, California, the City of San Francisco, the County of, San Francisco, San Francisco Beach, San Francisco, the City of, San Francisco, California, the City of Benicia, Carquinez, Illinois, Shively v., Oakland, Lands, California, the United States, the City of, San Francisco

ORG: Mission Rock Co., U.S. Supreme Court, Mission Rock Co., THE NINTH CIRCUIT, Syllabus, Union, the Circuit Court, Ninth Circuit, the California Dry Dock Company, the Mission Rock Company, the Mission Rock Company, the General Land Office of the United States, the General Land Office, Mount Diablo meridian, the California Dry Dock Company, the Mission Rock Company, The California Dry Dock Company, the California Dry Dock Company, the General Land Office, Mount Diablo meridian, Court, the California Dry Dock Company, Weber v. Commissioners, Union, Court, the State of Oregon, Union, the "Beach and Water Lot Act, the Disposition of Certain Property, Cowell, Montgomery Street, Union, Bishop, People v. Gold Run Ditch and Mining Co., Bishop, the Lake Front Case, Oakland Water Front Co., Congress, the California Dry Dock Company

CARDINAL: 189, 189, 198, 189, about fourteen, two, one, fourteen, one-hundredth, two, two, 2, 5, two, more than twenty, fourteen one-hundredths, 14-100, one one-hundredth, 1-100, ten to twenty-five, about half, 13, 332, 1, 2, 2, 5, fourteen one-hundredths, one one-hundredth, 189, 801, 1, 66, many thousands, two, 14-100, 1-100, 1, 2, 2, 5, 109, two, one, 14, 801, 18, 65, 524, 87, 294, 13, 445, 15, 635, 16, 125, 84, 124, 64, 40, 473, the many hundred, 67, 545, 66, 151, 99, 303, two, 99, 309, 118, 160, 2, 13, 333, two, 14-100, 1-100

DATE: 1903, 1903, March 11, 1903 , April 13, 1903, 1872, 1899, daily, the thirteenth day of January, 1899, July 1, 1864, January 13, 1899, October 12, 1898, March, 1864, April 4, 1870, the years 1870, 1871, the 11th day of July, 1872, May 1, 1878, the 6th day of June, 1900, May 1, 1878, the 6th day of June, 1900, October 12, 1898, January 13, 1899, the 11th of July, 1872, 1869-70, March 26, 1851, ninety-nine years, July 1, 1864

PERSON: Bowlby, William McKinley, Henry B. Tichenor, Henry B. Tichenor, McKENNA, Henry B. Tichenor, Henry B. Tichenor, Justice Gray, Bowlby, Justice Gray, Bowlby, Water Lots, Smith, Morse, Eldridge, Chapin v. Bourne, Hyman v. Read, Holladay, Frisbie, Taylor, Justice Temple, Ross, Shirley, Heckman, Swett, Shirley, Heckman, Swett, Bowlby, Heckman, Swett, McKinley

LOC: Northern District, Mount Diablo, the Bay of San Francisco, the Bay of San Francisco, the Mission Island, Straits, Mission Island

QUANTITY: 14.69 acres, about four acres, 14.69 acres, three feet, sixty feet

MONEY: 355,000, many millions of dollars, 250,000, 5,000

NORP: Spanish, Mexican

WORK_OF_ART: VI, VIII, 'An Act, Expedite the Settlement of Titles

ORDINAL: first, first

PRODUCT: Wheeler v. Miller

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //