Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kitply Industries Ltd. Vs. California Pacific Trading Corporation

Decided On : Jul-29-2009

Court : Guwahati

LAW: the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Company Petition No. 10 of 2002, Section 439, Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Companies Act, Section 44A, Section 9, Section 33, Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 2(9, Section 43, Section 1, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 44, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 47, Section 13.Explanation, Section 44A. Even, Section 44A, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 38, Section 39(1, Section 39, Section 38, Section 39(1, Section 44A, Section 13, Section 39, Section 44A, Section 13 and Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, Rule 36(1, Section 891, Section 13, Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 2, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 2, Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 13, the Code of Civil Procedure.31, Section 44A, Section 44A, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 2 of the Act 8 of 1937, Section 2 of Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act, Section 44A, Section 44A, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 40, the Evidence Act, Section 40, Section 41, the Evidence Act, Section 42, Section 41, Section 43, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 131, Section 13, the Evidence Act.39, Section 13, Section 44A, Section 44A(3)2 the existence of, Section 13, Section 143, Section 434 of the Act, Section 439, Section 433, Section 439(1)(a, Section 439(1, Section 433, Section 439, Section 439, Section 439.48, Section 233A, the Companies Act, Section 439, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 439, Section 439, Section 439, Section 439, the Companies Act, Section 44A, Section 439, the Companies Act, Section 439, the Companies Act, Section 47, Section 243, Section 433

PERSON: J. Chelameswar, Sri Jawaharlal Gupta, inter se, Gazette, Gazette, Tsavliris Salvage, Dicey, Lawrence Collins, Parke B., Smyth, Williams, Jones, Blackburn J., L. R. 6 Q. B. 139, L.R., Scott J., Blackburn J.'s, L.R., Scott J., L.R., Scott J., Scott J., Scott J., Robert Phillimore, Moloji Nar Singh Rao Shitole v. Shankar Saran, J. L. Kapur.26, Dicey, Dicey, Mohan Singh, Chettiar, K.S. Rm, Firm Shwebo, or(g

DATE: November 19, 2008, 1956, 1956, April 12, 2001, June 29, 2002, June 24, 2002, November 19, 2008, January 7, 2009, an early date, February 1, June 17, 2009, 1908, 1908, February 5, 2008, June 17, 2009, issue.10, 1908, 43, 44, 39, the seventeenth century, 1842, 1845, 1975, 19, '29, 1937, 1957 Mad 25, 1933, November 18, 1938, 1953, March 1, 1953, 1933, 1937, 1872, 40 - 43, 41, 42, three weeks, 46, 13.3 14, a year, annual, five consecutive financial years

ORG: California Pacific Trading Corporation, Kitply Industries Ltd., Sections 439, California Pacific Trading Corporation, Kitply Industries Ltd., California Pacific Trading Corporation, Kitply Industries Ltd., Learned Counsel, CPC, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, the State of, CPC, CPC, Sections, CPC, CPC, the State of Jammu & Kashmir, District Court, District Court, the District Court, the Central Government, the Government of India, Section 44A. Similarly, the Government of India, Supreme Court, M.V. Al Quamar v., Supreme Court, CPC, the District Court, the District Court, Indian Court, Russel, Schibsby v. Westenholz, Adams v. Cape Industries, The Court of Appeal, The Court of Appeal, Adams v. Cape Industries, the Court of Appeal, the American Union, the Federal Court, The Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, the Privy Council, Lordships, sequitur forum rei', the Supreme Court, AIR 1962, The Supreme Court, CPC, Clauses, N.P.A.K., British India, the Reciprocal Enforcements of Judgments (India) Order, the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement, CPC, Sections 10, 11 and, Parliament, State, CPC, CPC, Clauses, CPC, Sections 13, CPC, the Indian Legislatures, CPC, Sections 433, part;45, Sections 433, the Central Government, the State Government, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, CPC, CPC, CPC, justice;(e, territory.-, District Court, District Court, Registrar, Tribunal, Registrar, State, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Government, State, or(d, Registrar, the Central Government, the Central Government

CARDINAL: 2009, 345, one, 11,06,00,227, 2009, 345, 2009, 345, 2009.7, 2, one, 11, two, three, II, 36 - 42, 36, 36, 6, 44A, 3, 44A(1, 38, 2000, 8, 318):63, 15 - 20, 3, transferee, 3, transferee, transferee, transferee, 3, 567, 568, one, one, 9, 13, 1870, 1870, one, 1870, 6, 1870, 21, 171, 4, one, 10, 570, 28, 20, 637, 6, 5, one, 27):The, 23, 13, 12, 434, 439, One, two, one, 434, 439, 4, 5, 5, 5, 235, 237, 13, 14, 13, 3, 433, seven, 439

WORK_OF_ART: 148, 148, 148, 'The Conflict of Laws'

GPE: America, India, the United States, Middle District, North Carolina, US, the United States of America, India, India, Clauses, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Clauses, Clauses, England, England, England, Godard, England, England, Schibsby, Texas, Illinois, Texas, the United States, Illinois, Texas, Schibsby, the United States, the United States, Illinois, the United States, Sirdar, Singh, Faridkot, the Roman Empire, recognises.27, England, India, Roshanlal Kuthalia v., R.B., India, India, Burma, the United Kingdom, Burma, the Republic of India, India, rem'.36, Sections 40, India, Clauses, England, Sections, England, India, Clauses, India, Clauses

MONEY: 8 per cent

NORP: American, Indian, Indian, English, English, English, Indian, Indian, British, Indian, Indian, Indian, American

ORDINAL: first, third, first, second, first, first, first

PRODUCT: 8 SCC 278, 4 SCC 628, Geo

LANGUAGE: English, English

EVENT: SC 1737, 1742, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code

FAC: Burma AIR

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //