Bhadarmal Hazarimal Vs. Income-tax Officer, a Ward, Jorhat.

Decided On : Mar-01-1974

Court : Guwahati

LAW: article 226 of the Constitution of India, section 23(5)(a, section 153(2, Section 147 and, section 147, section 139, section 147, section 139, section 34, article 226 of the Constitution to prohibit action, section 34, section 34(1

DATE: 1961, the assessment year 1958-59, the assessment year 1958-59, 1922, October 30, 1958, July 12, 1968, July 23, 1968, year 1958-59;Rs.1, 35, 40, 48, August 13, 1968, 161/1, May 12, 1969, the assessment year 1958-59, 30 days, May 21, 1969, the assessment year 1958-59, 1961, that year, that year, the assessment year, 1922, 11 of 1922, 153(2, four years, four years, one year, 1961, the assessment year, that year, the assessment year 1958-59, May 12, 1969, 8 years, the previous year 2014 R. N., year 1958-59, 35, 64, 10,0003, 40, 48, the year, 161/1, the assessment year 1958-59, the assessment year, that year, 1922, that year, the relevant year, the relevant year, the assessment year, the relevant year, the relevant year

PERSON: R. N. 2014, Upper Chitpur Road, Dinanath Mathura Lane, Vivekananda Road, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Shri Prahladrai Agarwalla, Upper Chitpur Road, Vivekananda Road, Vivekananda Road, Mahatma Gandhi Road, B. N. SARMA J. - I

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

CARDINAL: 22,863, 2/1, 15,000 70,000, 9,226-9-6, 7,426-9-6, 1800, four, 148, 147, 148, 153, 148, 153, 1, 2, 1, 2, 153, 148, 153, 2, 148, two, 25,0002, 20,0004, 15,000 70,000, 70,000, one, 70,000, four, 70,000, one, 70,000, ten

ORG: B-312/58, B-312/58, or(d, -(i, Board, Board, Shri Chandmal Agarwalla, Central, Direct Taxes, Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, Explanation, Explanation, the High Court, Burlop Dealers Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court

GPE: Bijoytiatola, Bijotiatola

ORDINAL: first

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta