Security Trust Co. Vs. Black River National Bank

Decided On : Dec-01-1902

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Constitution, Section 4672, The Probate Code, the Probate Code

ORG: Security Trust Co., Black River National Bank - 187, U.S. Supreme Court, Security Trust Co., Black River National Bank, U.S. 211, Security Trust Company, Black River National Bank No, THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, Syllabus, Court, the Black River National Bank of Lowville, the Circuit Court, the Security Trust Company Page, State of New York, State, the First National Bank of Decorah, the Probate Court, State, Court, the Probate Court, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, the Eighth Circuit, Security Trust Company, Court, the Circuit Court, the Black River National Bank of Lowville, the Security Trust Company of St. Paul, the Security Trust Company, the Probate Court, the supreme court, sec, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, SEC, Lindckugel v. Probate Court of Sibley County, the supreme court, the supreme court, Probate Court, the Supreme Court, The Security Trust Company, the Security Trust Company, the Security Trust Company, The Black River National Bank, the Circuit Court, the District Court of, Court, sec, Court, the Supreme Court, the supreme court, Court, the supreme court, the Supreme Court, Court, supreme court, Court, the Supreme Court, the supreme court, the supreme court, Union Bank, Vaiden, Union Bank, the supreme court, Court, State, the Circuit Court, the State of New York, S.W. Matteson, Court, the Legislature of the State of Minnesota, Matteson, the supreme court, the supreme court, the Circuit Court, Court

DATE: 1902, 1902, April 21-22, 1902, December 1, 1902, January, 1897, about the 3d day of September, 1895, the 27th day of February, 1894, four months, March 22, 1894, the 24th day of November, 1894, the 24th day of November, 1894, February 12, 1897, March 20, 1897, the 18th day of January, 1899, April 17, 1899, October 17, 1900, 187 U. S. 214 Dent, January, 1897, September 3, 1895, 1894, 4523, one year, six months, 4524, one year, 4527, 4638, 4639, 4640, 4641, 4642, 4509, less than six months, more than one year, one year, six months, 4510, 4511, 4514, five years, 4517, 4522, 4730, 92, 289, July 22, 1895, September 3, 1895, the same day, six months, March 31, 1896, April 27, 1896, November 21, 1896, December 15, January 4, 1897, April 17, 1899, 1894, 4730, the end of two years, 149 U. S. 615, 10 F. 55, 78, three years, the lapse of eighteen months, January 22, 1897, eighteen months, six months, eighteen months, less than eighteen months, April 27, 1896, 1896, April 27, 1896, April 27, 1896, six months, the eighteen months, 4523, one year, six months, one year, section 4509, the period of, six months, less than six months, more than one year, more than eighteen months, six and eighteen months, six months

CARDINAL: 187, 39, 187, two, 104, 380, Two, 33, 40, 296, 61, 37, 160, 84, 1, 2, 6, 37, 160, 61, 61, One, 18, 503, 4, 498, 9, 745, 21, 276, 113, 21, 276, 18, 504, 7, 430, 27, 18, less than six

GPE: the State of Minnesota, the United States, the United States, Minnesota, the United States, the United States, the District of Minnesota, St. Paul, the United States, Lowville, Lewis County, the State of Minnesota, the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota, the State of Minnesota, Iowa, Decorah, the State of Iowa, Ramsey County, the United States, Ramsey County, the United States, Minnesota, the United States, the County of Lewis, New York, Minnesota, Ramsey County, Minnesota, the State of Minnesota, Minnesota, the United States, Minnesota, Sibley County, Ramsey County, the County of Ramsey, the State of Minnesota, the United States, the District of Minnesota, Ramsey County, Minnesota, Minn., the State of Minnesota, the United States, Carroll County v., the State of Minnesota, the United States, the United States, the United States, Arkansas, Arkansas, Arkansas, the United States, Arkansas, the United States, Missouri, the United States, the District of Rhode Island, Rhode Island, the United States, the State of Minnesota, Arkansas, the State of Minnesota, Minnesota, the United States, Minnesota, the United States, the State of Minnesota, the United States

PERSON: Sumner W. Matteson, Sumner W. Matteson, Matteson, Matteson, James H. Easton & Company, James H. Easton & Company, James H. Easton & Company, Sumner W. Matteson, Matteson, Matteson, Matteson, Matteson, Matteson, Matteson, Sumner W. Matteson, Sumner W. Matteson, Sumner W. Matteson, Matteson, Matteson, Matteson, Matteson, Statutes, lien, Dana v. Probate, Schmidt, Stark, Mitchell, Stats, Hurley, Hamilton, Matteson, Sumner W. Matteson, Matteson, Hurley, Hamilton, Mitchell, J., Schmidt, Stark, Schmidt, Stark, Stat, Burgess v. Seligman, Lawrence v. Nelson, Byers, McAuley, Aspden v. Nixon, Yonley v. Lavender, Morgan, Yonley, Byers, McAuley, Pulliam v. Pulliam, Hammond, Payne v. Hook, Dodd, Ghiselin, Brewer, Miner, Aylesworth, Bauserman, Blunt, Yonley, Lavender, Scott v. Armstrong

MONEY: 2,500, 5,000, 6,782.89, 5,000, as much as, as much as

PERCENT: eight percent, 147 U. S. 652

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, fifth

QUANTITY: one hundred and two

WORK_OF_ART: State ex Rel, The Probate Code, State ex Rel

LOC: Minn. 94, Minn. 91, Minn. 91, Minn. 91