Mukesh Malhotra and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Dec-30-2009

Court: Himachal Pradesh

LAW: Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 143(3, the Income Tax Act, Section 154(2

GPE: Singh, Act.3, A.O., A.O., A.O., Shimla

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: six, six, three, three, one, 19.10.1994, 11,46,703/-, 30.3.2004, 13, 105, 10,94,625/-, one, 105, three, six, half, three, 90, half, 105, one

DATE: 25th July, 2007, the year 1994-95, the year 1994-95, 1961, the year 1994-95, years, daily, the year 1994-95, working days, daily, the year 1994-95, the year 1995-96, 22.11.2006, daily, years, days, the year 1994-95, 75 days, the year 1995-96, days, days, summer months of May, June and July, nine months, only 105 days, days, days, less than 105 days

ORG: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Shimla, the Tourism Department Lift, inter alia, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tourism Department, Shri B.N. Malhotra, the Settlement Commission, Commission, Commission, the Tourism Department, Income Tax Commissioner (Appeals, the Tribunal., Commissioner (Appeals, Assessing, Learned Tribunal, the Tourism Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Assessing, the Tourism Department of the State, Tribunal

PERSON: Chandigarh Bench, Shri B.N. Malhotra, Shri B.N.

FAC: Camp at Shimla, Mall

WORK_OF_ART: The Mall Road

TIME: 10,000/- approximately

PERCENT: 20%, 20%

LOC: Shimla Town