State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Amrik Singh

Decided On : Jul-26-2007

Court : Himachal Pradesh

LAW: Section 313, Section 279, the Indian Penal Code, Section 337, the Indian Penal Code, Section 313, the Indian Penal Code

PERSON: Surinder Singh, Shri V.K. Verma, Counsel, Chandigarh, Veena Parmar, Veena Parmar, Veena Parmar, Veena Parmar, R.G. Sood, D. R. Sharma, Harinder Singh, Shyam Lal, him.8, Veena Parmar, Veena Parmar, Harinder Singh, and(iv, Sidharth Parmar, Shimla, Veena Parmar, R. G. Sood, D.R. Sharma, Mechanic, Photographs Exts

NORP: J.1

ORG: State, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court, Additional Advocate General, State, Temple of Mahunag Devta at Vaknaghat, the National Highway, the Indira Gandhi Medical College, Ext, PW 2/A of Sidharth Parmar, FIR Ext, Ext, MLC, Ext, Court, PW 4 Bhajna Nand & PW 5 Ram Rattan, Motor Mechanic, HC, Court, the Mechanic (PW 7, Court, Court, PW 3 Dr., PW 2, Court, PW 7 Chinta Mani,, PI, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court

DATE: 1996, PW 3, PW 10, PW 10, PW 3, PW 3, PW 3, PW 10, about a decade ago, about three years, more than 6 years, more than a decade, one month, before 31st August, 2007

CARDINAL: 1, 5, 6, 5, 2, 3, 337, 500/-

WORK_OF_ART: PW 2 Sidharth Parmar, PW 9 Manmohan Chanda, PW 2 Sidharth Parmar, Probation of Offenders Act

PRODUCT: Maruti Car No, the Maruti Car, PW 1 Rajeev Sood, the Maruti Car, Sections 279

GPE: the Haryana Roadways, PW, that:(i, negligence.12

QUANTITY: 2-3 feet, about 3 feet

EVENT: PW 10, PW 3.14, PW 3