Mohammad Shaffi Vs. State of H.P.

Decided On : Jan-06-2009

Court : Himachal Pradesh

LAW: Section 279 IPC, Section 337 IPC, Section 338 IPC, Section 154, Section 397, Section 154 Cr, Section 304-A. Culpable

PERSON: Deepak Gupta, Shimla, Mohd, Shimla, Dharam Singh, Shanti Devi, P.C., FIR Ext, Dharam Singh, Shanti Devi, Sant Ram, Sanjeev Bhushan, Rajesh Mandhotra, Sanjeev Bhushan, Dharam Singh, Ext., Mohd, Shanti Devi, Shanti Devi, Dharam Singh, Vidya Sagar, Shanti, Dharam Singh, Dharam Singh, Sanjeev Bhushan, Shanti Devi, Dharam Singh, Dharam Singh, Shanti Devi, Shanti Devi, Dharam Singh, Sanjeev Bhushan, Dharam Singh, Dharam Singh, Shanti Devi, Syed Akbar, Lord Atkin, Andrews

NORP: J.1, telephonic, Australian

ORG: This Revision Petition, Court, DDU, Hospital at Shimla, PW-3, Lady-Reading, PW-7 Sant Ram, Court, Court, Sections 337, Court, the High Court, PW-7, Shimla, Court, Ext, the Public Prosecutor, Ext, Chhota Shimla, Chhota Shimla, Chhota Shimla, parked.10, PWs-5 & 6, Smt, PW-7, DDU Hospital, Chhota Shimla, Chhota Shimla, PW-7, Laws of England, Kenny's Outlines of Criminal Law, the American Law Institute, The Apex Court, Sections 299, the Apex Court, Appellate Court, Appellate Court

CARDINAL: 9.9.2002, 279, 337, 338, 6.2.1999, maruti, HP-02-1323, one, one, one, 6.2.1999, 338, 401, 6.2.1999, 2-3, about 3.30, only one, one, 4.45, two, two, two, 34, 1, 3, 38, only two, 124, 2, 168, 1979CriLJ1374, 2, 552, 2007CriLJ1451, 1, two, two, one, two, about 3

DATE: 3 months, three months, four months, six months, HP-02-1323, 3 months, 19.6.2001 about 2 years, 6th February, 1999, 1323, the same day, 1934, 1957, 1978, the first half of the 19th century, 1937, 2008

TIME: about 4 p.m., about 6 p.m., 4 p.m., 5.15 p.m.

PRODUCT: Maruti

FAC: Police Station, Sadar

GPE: Counsel, P.C., P.C., Halsbury, Kamataka, case.19, Rathnashalvan v. State, Karnataka

QUANTITY: a couple of feet

ORDINAL: first, third