Meenakshi Mehta Vs. Major Atul Mehta

Decided On : Jul-16-1999

Court : Himachal Pradesh

LAW: Section 28, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13 of the Act, Section 13 of the Act, Section 6, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 406/34, the Indian Penal Code, Section 13 of the Act, Section 498-A, the Indian Penal Code, Act No, Section 498-A of the Code, Section 13 of the Act, Section 13, Paras 5

ORG: M.R. Verma, Solan, Shamli (Uttar Pradesh, Belgaum, Chandimandir, the Court of the learned, Solan, Solan, Solan, Solan, D.A.V. Public School, Solan, Command Hospital, Subathu, Panchkula, Panchkula, COC, COAS, Panchkula, the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solan, Subathu, Bank, Command Hospital, District Judge, Court, AIR 1975 SC, the Supreme Court, Indian Legislation, Court, Bank, Ext, State Bank of India, Ext, Ext, the Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Ext, S/Major, Army, Ext, Ext, Ext, Ext, Ext, Ext, Ext

NORP: J.1, Hindu, Indian, Nimrat, Nimrat

DATE: 1955, September 1, 1998, September 28, 1984, October 23, 1986, November 25, 1990, August 6, 1993, October 23, 1984, the year 1985, October 23, 1986, 1989, annual, November 1989, March 1993, April 8, 1993, March 1993, 1961, March 1993, March 27, 1996, 1950, 1534, 1991, 156).11, 1860, March 1993, pre-March 1993, October 23, 1986, November 25, 1990, March 1993, the pre-March 1993, pre-March 1993, pre-March 1993, March 1993, April 18. 1993, paras 5, 1991, paras 5, March 1993, paras 5

PRODUCT: the 'Act'

GPE: Delhi, Delhi, Sikkim, Panchkula, prove:(i, Sharadh, Delhi

PERSON: Chandigarh, Subathu, Karan, Nidhi, Sharad, Karan, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Karan, Headquarters Delhi Area, Lo, Hank Officer, Chandigarh, Nos, N.G. Dastane, Dastane, Singh Bullar, Sim LC, follows:'498-A., Vanita Kapur, Subathu, Vanita Kapur, Singh Bhullar's, Sim LC, Vanita Kapur, Vanita Kapur, Vanita Kapur

CARDINAL: one, 2, 1, 3, 6, 1, 2, 9, 1, one, 12, one, Two, 20, one, 10, 18, 1, 156, 5, 10, 18, one, 10, 18, 17, one, 10, 18, 10, 18

LANGUAGE: English