Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Sh. Moti Lal Vs. State of H.P.
Decided On : Mar-01-1996
Court : Himachal Pradesh
LAW: the Arbitration Act, Section 30, the Arbitration Act, Section 30, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 29, the Arbitration Act
PERSON: Arun Kumar Goel, Januray, Award, OP Non-Objector 2, Award, J.S. Katoch, J. S. Bhogal, J.S. Katoch, J.C. Katoch, M.L., Nos, Shri J.S., Sibal, Sibal, Sri M.L. Wadhwa, Sibal, Bill, Sri Wadhwa's, M.M. Abdul Khader, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Counter-Claim No, Sibal, Shri Chauhan, J.S. Katoch, G.C. Roy, Shri Chauhan
NORP: J.1
ORG: the State of Himachal Pradesh, RCCT-Beam, BhatkaNallah on Bodh Chakki Dhar, Superintending Engineer, Arbitration Cell, H.P., Solan, Court, the Registry of the Court, OMP No, Court, O.P. Objector 3, O.P. Objector, Nurpur Division, H.P. PWD, AIR 1987, Court, the Arbitration Agreement, AIR 1989, SC, Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, the Union of India, the High Court, the High Court, the Union of India, The Union of India, Executive Engineer, High Court, the Union of India, the Union of India, the Hall of Industries, the High Court, the High Court, the Union of India, Court, Court, Engineer, AIR 1995 SC 2423, the apex Court, the Apex Court, AIR 1992, SC, Irrigation Department, Government of, Government of Orissa, Court
CARDINAL: 16.50, 20/1987-88, 8-6-1988, 1990.2, 9-3-1993, 1-6-1993, 25-6-1994, 33, 4, 633, 29-6-1995, 29, 4., 5, 4., 29, 6, 1, 2 7, 4, 3 and 4 8, 3, 6, 4, 3 and 4, 9, 15, 3, 21, approximately half, 1400/, 700/-, 63, 13, 15, 3, one, 10, 11, 12, 5, 633, 732, 13., 1-3-1996
DATE: 5,71,234.20, 30-12-1994, 1994, 4, January 1990, No 63, 21, 1994
GPE: question.3, M.T., Orissa, p.a.
TIME: 9-9-1994, 9-9-1994, 9-9-1994
EVENT: SC 81
PRODUCT: Arbtirator, Arbtirator, Arbtirator, Arbtirator
QUANTITY: 600/- per metric tonne, 2,553.98 per metric tonne, 700/- per metric tonne
PERCENT: 10%