Semantic Analysis by spaCy
The State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Buti Nath
Decided On : Sep-24-1956
Court : Himachal Pradesh
LAW: Section 8, the Opium Act, Section 9(a, Section 109, Section 103, the Arms Act, the Explosive Substances Act, Section 19, Section 5, Section 19, Section 5
GPE: Ramabhadran, Bansi, Dasondhi, Venkatasubba Reddi, Emperor, Santa Singh
ORG: J.C. 1, Lilu, the Nahan Police, Magistrate, Additional District Magistrate, Lilu, Buti Nath, Magistrate, The State Government, Buti Nath under Section 417, District Inspector, Daulat Ram, Lilu, Buti Nath, Lilu, Lilu, Government Advocate, Buti Nath, Court, Additional District Magistrate, Government Advocate, Court, AIR 1955 Him-P 2, the Buti Nath, Additional District Magistrate, Hari Ram (P.W. 1, Pola, Buti Nath, Lilu, Court, AIR, Court, Customs Preventive Officers, AIR, Buti Nath, Lilu, Buti Nath, Banda, Buti Nath, Lilu, Buti Nath, kunda, Buti Nath, High Court, Court, Buti Nath, Lilu, State of Himachal Pradesh, AIR 1955 Him-P 26, AIR 1949 Him-P 15, U.P., AIR 1953 SC 122, Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1954 SC 15 (H, AIR 1954
PERSON: Buti Nath, K.B. Chandel, Dasondhi, Mohalla Rani Tal, Nahan, Gangbir Singh, Sewa Singh, Banda, Dasondhi, Buti Nath, Lal v. Mohi Ram, Hira Singh, Roshan Lal, Buti Nath, Buti Nath, Dasondhi, Hira Singh, Buti Nath, Dasondhi, Buti Nath, Cyril C. Baker v. Emperor, Cal 668, Baker, Order C. Baker, Baker, C. C. Baker, Graham, Malhotra, Malhotra, Sewa Singh, Buti Nath, Buti Nath, Buti Nath, Chandan Lal, Koti Darbar, Ram Chand, Khan, Zwinglee Ariel v. State, Pran Das v. State, Buti Nath
CARDINAL: one, 31-3-1955, 2, 4, two, 10, 3, 3., 4., 9595, 5., 6, 29, 21, 8, 6., One, two, one, about 7, two, twenty, 8, two, one, 9, two, 10, two, One, 2 1/2, 1944, 339, 11, 12, 13
TIME: about 1 P.M., the night of 23rd January or morning, the evening, a few hours
DATE: the last four years, the last one year, 1930, January, 23rd January
PRODUCT: Calcutta
WORK_OF_ART: S.S. Edavana
FAC: Rangoon
LOC: Straits
ORDINAL: second
NORP: Goanese
EVENT: SC 36