Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Chamba Valley Transport Ltd. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Decided On : Aug-11-1952

Court : Himachal Pradesh

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 19, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 59, the Easements Act, Article 19, Constitution, Constitution, the Constitution of the United States of America, Article 19, Constitution, Article 19 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 19 by Section 3 of the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, Article 19, Constitution, Article 32, Article 226, Constitution, Section 6, Article 32, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226

GPE: ORDERChowdhry, Beary, Bombay, Chagla, the U. K., the U. S. A., London, Halsbury

ORG: J.C. 1, the Chamba Valley Transport Limited, the State of Himachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Hill State, Himachal Pradesh, Company, Chamba, State, Company, the State of Chamba, Government Advocate, the Motor Vehicles Act.6, Tight, State of Chamba, State, AIR 1915 P. C, Baman and Raman Ltd., AIR 1952 S. C. 192', Court, Madhya Bharat', AIR, Government Advocate, AIR, Government Advocate, State, Recognition, State, the State of Madhya Pradesh', State, Court, Charanjitlal v. Union of India', Chamba Valley Transport Co. Ltd., Administration, Himachal Pradesh, Transport, the Transport Department, the Transport Department, Himachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, State, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, Court, the Supreme Court, Hon'ble Court, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, Court, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh', AIR, State, the Baghat Transport Service Limited, the State of Himachal Pradesh, Court, Chamba, Company, Directors, Government, Company, Company, the Central Government, Company, the Central Government, Directors, Bishop, the High Court of Justice, Court, State, State, State

PERSON: g).2, Chamba, Bannikhet, Mehta Autar Chand, Chamba, Bannikhet, G. Veerappa Pillai, Chamba State, Harendranath v. State, Jeshingbhai, Janardhan Reddy v. State, T. Hassan Kutty', Madhya, Salmond, Laski, Chintanianrao, S. C. R., Rashid Ahmad v. Municipal Board, Kairana, S. C. R., C. J., Jeshingbhai, S. C. B. 869.12, Chamba District Chamba, Bani Khet, Chamba, Bani Khet, Chamba, Transport, Sd./-, Chamba District, Chamba, Lal v. Uttar Pradesh', Thapper v. State, S. C. B. 594, Sardar Gur, Sri, G.N. Raina, Sri Raina, Sri Mehta, Sri Mehta, Sardar Gur, Directors, delay.15, Ellenborough

DATE: 5-year, 31-7-1952, 10-9-1949, about a year and a half, 8-11-1950, 5-year, 30th September 1949, 5-year, 59, 5-year, 1882, 1950, 46, 1947, April 1931, 1791, 10-9-1949, 10-9-1949, 10th September, 1949, 1951, 1951, 49, about tea months, 11-5-1950, January 1951, February, 1950, 8-11-1950, 8-11-1950, 8-11-1950, less than a month, 1812, 1269

QUANTITY: 30-9-1949

LOC: the Hill States

CARDINAL: two, one, 1, 5., 31, two, two, 1, 2, 26, two, 363, 280, 9, 230, 90, seven, 26, 759, 566, 363, 386, 28, 10, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 257, 267, 1, 1950.So, 598, 597.14, One, 1, 257, one, 25, 22, 15, 15, 117, 136, 744:'The, 18, 50/-/-as

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second, first, first, second, second, first, first, first, first, second, third

WORK_OF_ART: 1951 Mad, Articles of Chapter V of Part VI of the;

NORP: R.

FAC: the Chamba-Bannikhet

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //