Chesapeake and Ohio Ry. Co. Vs. Dixon

Decided On : Nov-19-1900

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Dixon No. 40, Constitution, section 241, Section 6

ORG: Chesapeake & Ohio Ry, Dixon, U.S. Supreme Court, Dixon, Ohio Railway Company, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, the Circuit Court, the Boyd County Court, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, State, the Ashland & Catlettsburg Turnpike, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, R. H, the Circuit Court, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, State, the State of Kentucky, the Circuit Court, The Boyd Circuit Court, the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company, Chesapeake, Ohio Railroad Company, the State of Kentucky, the Boyd Circuit Court, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company, the Circuit Court, the Supreme Court, Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company, Court, the Court of Appeals of, the Boyd Circuit Court, Dixon, N. O. & T. P. Railway Company, Clark & Fin, Barton, Hill Coal Co., Farwell v. Boston & Worcester Railroad Company, Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Court, Louisville & Nashville Railroad, Connell, Ford, Rock Island &c., Company, Martin, Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Court, Plymouth Gold Mining Company, Amador & Sacramento Canal Company, Connell v. Utica &c., Railroad Co.

CARDINAL: 179, 179, 179, one, 47, 615, two, 72, 6, 894, 910, 3, 283, 4, 49, 125, 41, two, one, one, 92, 13, 241, 15, 560

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Boyd County, Kentucky, Boyd County, Kentucky, the County of, Kentucky, Catlettsburg, Ashland, Boyd County, Kentucky, the United States, the District of Kentucky, the State of Virginia , Virginia, the United States, the District of Kentucky, the United States, thereon, the United States, Kentucky, Virginia, Kentucky, the United States, the District of Kentucky, the United States, MR, Kentucky, Kentucky, Kentucky, Cincinnati, MR, Massachusetts, Kentucky, the United States, Wangelin, Chicago, U.S., MR, MR

DATE: 1900, October 10, 1900 , November 19, 1900, October 19, 1894, 22d day of September, 1894, 1894, the 22d day of September, 1894, the 30th of January, 1895, 90, 487, 169 U. S. 92

PERSON: Chesapeake, Lucy Dixon, Alexander Dixon, R. H. Chalkey, William Sidles, Alexander Dixon, Alexander Dixon, R. H. Chalkey, Chalkey, Lucy Dixon, Alexander Dixon, R. H. Chalkey, William Sidles, Chalkey, Sidles, appellee, Lucy Dixon, Chalkey, Sidles, Alexander Dixon, Chalkey, Sidles, Dixon, Chalkey, Sidles, CHIEF, Chalkey, Sidles, Warax, Pollock, Brougham, Duncan, Reid, Shaw, JUSTICE GRAY, Mulchey, Pirie v. Tvedt, Sloane, Anderson, Little v. Giles, Torrence v. Shedd, Dixon, Whitcomb v. Smithson, Justice Blatchford, McKENNA

MONEY: 30,000, 2,000

WORK_OF_ART: Torts (Am, Encyc

ORDINAL: third, first

PERCENT: 118 U. S. 596 , 132 U. S. 599 , 156 U. S. 335 , 114 U. S. 635 , 178 U. S. 245

PRODUCT: Wangelin