Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Swedish East Asia Co. Ltd.
Decided On : Dec-19-1989
Court : Kolkata
LAW: the Surtax Act, the Surtax Act, section 5, section 5, section 10, section 5, section 10, section 5, section 10, section 5, section 10', section 2, section 5, section 5, section 5, section 10, section 10, section 2, section 5, section 5, section 10, section 10, section 5(1, section 10
ORG: SUHAS, Tribunal, the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, The Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, the First Schedule, the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, the Companies (Profits) Surtax Rules, the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, Tribunal
DATE: 1961, 1964, 1961, 1961, the previous year, 1961, the first day of the previous year, the assessment year, previous year, '4, 1961, any previous year, such year, such year, 45, 1964, 1964, 1961, '13, 1964, 8, 1961, 1964, 1961
CARDINAL: 4, 29,00,709.The, 4, 13, 17, 6, 10, 2, 2, 4, 13, 17, 2, 2, 5, two hundred thousand, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 2, 2, 13, 12, 4, 13, 12, 13(Please, 9, 13, 9, 13, 13, 1961.Rule 4, 1, 2, 3, 9
ORDINAL: Second
GPE: Sweden, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India
NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian
PERCENT: 3.3177%, 3.3177%, 10%
PERSON: Subject, Appendix, Note 8).(b
QUANTITY: 10.I am
WORK_OF_ART: 'Computation of
TIME: 9)'Notes 8 and
PRODUCT: Notes 8