Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kal Electronic and Consultancy (P.) Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Development Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Decided On : Sep-20-2002

Court : Kolkata

LAW: the Companies Act, Order 1, Rule 8, Order 2, Rule 2, Section 115, the Evidence Act, Order 21, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 23, Rule 1, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 634, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 15(1, Section 15 of the Act, Section 15(1, Section 22, Order 1, Rule 8, Section 22, Section 15 of the Act, the Registration Act

PERSON: Amitava Lala, Bangalore, Distric Bhind, Madhya Pradesh, District Surat, Dapthary Ferreira, Diwan, District Surat, District Surat, District Surat, BOB, BOB, District Bhind, Madhya Pradesh, Nos, S.N. Mukherjee, Nos, Ashis Ranjan Das, Rajendra Nath Mullick, Kumar Sarkar v. Basanti Ray, Mukherjee, Mukherjee, Viswanathan, Mookherjee, Mukherjee, Viswanathan, Raja Basuchowdhury, Mukherji, Viswanathan, Canara Bank, Gram Panchayat v. Shree Vallabh Glass Works Ltd., Bench, Mukherji, Mukherji, A.V. Sampat, Mukherji, pari passu inter, pari passu, Kalyan Banerjee, G. A. Nos, Tridib Kr, Sarkar

NORP: J.1, settlement.33

CARDINAL: 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 690, 3,946, 3, 1, 1, 2, 20, 82, seven, 53,08,000, 27,10,000, 80,18,000, three, 1, 3, 2, 2, 29,61,027, 37, 2, 1, 3, two, two, One, 93, two, 1987]1SCR200, two, 4, one, 158, 1998]3SCR170, 1990]1SCR966, 2, 85, 53, 1, 3, two, 3, 1, 3, one, 27, 1,000, two, one, 3, 87, 93, 627, one, 3, 690, 1,000

DATE: 1956, April 26, 2000, January 28, 2000, February 22, 2000, February 22, 2000, March 7, 2000, February 24, 1993, April 25, 2000, September 11, 2000, October 21, 2000, January 22, 2001, March 13, 2001, March 7, 2000, February 24, 1993, March 7, 2001, January 31, 2001, a period of, six months, March 31, 2000, 1985, SICA 1985, '10, March 23, 2001, March 7,2000, March 23, 2001, just ten days, a year, seven days, 37, seven days, seven days, 10 days, '14, August 9, 2001, 1998, 1956, June 14, 2002, 1985, 1997, 1996, March 13, 2001, June 14, 2002, 1985, August 26, 2002, February 24, 1993, a period of, seven days, 3158, 3245, 3157, 3217, 3155, 3159, 3156, 3738, 3571, 3425 of 2001, 2002, a period of, seven days, seven days

ORG: this High Court, Notice, the Central Government, Company Law Board, Central Government, Industrial Development Bank of India, Air Force Group Insurance Society, Unit Trust of India, Naval Group Insurance Fund, Industrial Finance Corporation of, IFCI, Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd., the Company Law Board, The Bank of Baroda, Bank of Baroda, Financial Express, the Bank of Baroda, the Punjab National Bank, Madhya Pradesh Iron and Steel Company, Malanpur, the Punjab National Bank, Cyanides and Chemicals Company, Olpad, Cyanides and Chemicals Company, Olpad, the Punjab National Bank, the Bank of Baroda, the Punjab National Bank, the Adjudicating Authority, Superintendent of Stamps Surat, IFCI, the Bank of Baroda, the Industrial Finance Corporation, IFCI, the Bank of Baroda, the Bank of Baroda, the Bank of Baroda, Hindustan Engineering and Industries Ltd., Hindustan Development Corporation Ltd., HDC, the Bank of Baroda (BOB, BOB, Olpad, Olpad, I. HEI, Olpad, Gujrat, HEI, HDC, VIII, IX, HDC, BOB, the Company Law Board, BOB, the Punjab National Bank, HDC, BOB, HDC, MPAKVN, HDC, L/C, HDC, HDC, HDC, HDC, HDC, BOB, VIII, IX, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, HDC, HDC, BOB, Bank of Baroda, the Company Law Board, the Bank of Baroda, inter alia, the Punjab National Bank, the Bank of Baroda, the Bank of Baroda, Hindustan Engineering and Industries, the Bank of Baroda, the Bank of Baroda, settlement.16, the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, M. P. Iron and Steel Company Ltd., M. P. Electricity Board, Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, M.R. Goyal, Usha International Ltd., Sarguja Transport Service, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, the Gujarat High Court, Krashnkumar Balakram Pande v. Municipal Corporation, AIR1990Guj20, Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Union of India, Legislature, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstructions, Malanpur Steel Ltd., MSL, Hindustan Development Corporation Ltd., Board, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, the Bank of Baroda, Real Value Appliances Ltd., Burn Standard Co. Ltd., McDermott International Inc., Engineering Construction Services v., Allied Machinery Corporation Ltd., the Bank of Baroda, Bench, Board, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the M. P. Electricity Board, the Bank of Baroda, the Punjab National Bank, the Punjab National Bank, the Registrar of Companies, the High Court, the Punjab National Bank, this High Court, the Punjab National Bank, the Bank of Baroda, Registrar, Olpad, the Bank of Baroda, Registrar

LOC: Eastern Region, Additional District

GPE: India, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 93,63,543, HEI.II, Malanpur, Pranab, Delhi, thereto.22, the City of Baroda, Clause, Gujarat

ORDINAL: second, first, second, second, Firstly, Secondly, first, firstly, second, first, second, Secondly, Thirdly, firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, Fourthly, first, first, first, first, first

WORK_OF_ART: IX of HDC

MONEY: 15 per cent, 50 per cent, 15 per cent, 60 per cent, 10 per cent, 60 per cent, 10 per cent, 60 per cent, 5 per cent, USD 135 million

PRODUCT: Bench, Calcutta

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //