Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Tapan Kumar Mukherjee @ Tapan Mukherjee and ors. Vs. Nirmal Kanti Guha and ors.

Decided On : Nov-21-2008

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 41, Section 41, Section 41, Article 58 of the Limitation Act, Section 41, Section 47, Section 41, Section 11, Section 41, Section 11, Section 41, Section 49, Section 41, the Appellant No. 1, the Appellant No. 1

PERSON: Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Lenin Sarani, Nos, Sukumar Mukherjee, Sukumar Mukherjee, Lenin Sarani, Lenin Sarani, Nos, Sukumar Mukherjee, Sukumar Mukherjee, Bipin Behari Sadhukhan, Revamma

NORP: J.1

ORDINAL: first, 24th, 3rd, first, first, first

DATE: September, 2007, 13th, 2002, 2002, 1998, 5, the year 1968, 2nd April, 1993, the last 34 years.c, the 1st, 1998, the last 3 years, January 22, 2000, 22nd June, 1968, 22nd January, 2002, 23rd June, 1980, 1967, 2nd, 22nd February, 2002, the year 2002, the year 1998, the year 1998, 1963, 3 years, the year 1998, more than 3 years, seven days

GPE: Bench, Kolkata, Kolkata, Kolkata

ORG: City Civil Court, Calcutta, Title Suit, Title Suit No, the City Civil Court, S.C.C. Suit, Court, the High Court at Calcutta in Suit No, S.C.C. Suit, S.C.C. Suit, Small Causes Court, Calcutta, the Small Causes Court, the City Civil, the Presidency Small Causes Court, the Small Causes Court, the Small Causes Court, the Small Causes Court, the Small Causes Court, Corporation Tax, the Supreme Court, P.T., xerox

CARDINAL: 158, 158, 5, 1, 151, One, 1, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3 and 4, 416, 1978.e, 151, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1.b, 1, 1, 151, 1, 4, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, one, 1, 2, at least twelve, 1, 300

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //