Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Saibal Dey Vs. Chaitali Dey and anr.
Decided On : May-11-2006
Court : Kolkata
LAW: Section 125, Section 125, Section 125, Section 482, Section 126, Section 482, Section 125, Section 126, Section 482, Section 125, Section 125, Section 125, Section 125, Section 125
GPE: Sadhan, Cr, P.C., O.P., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Delhi, P.C., Cr, Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, Cr, P.C., O.P., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C.
PERSON: Kumar Gupta, Misc, Kolkata, Kolkata, Ram Kishan Rohtagi, Bhavani Amma Valsalamma, Neelam Sabharwal, S. Bhupinder, Singh Makkar v., Narinder Kaur, P.C., Saikat, Saikat Kundu, Kundu, Rs, Misc, Kolkata
NORP: J.1
ORG: Court, Family Court, the Family Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Municipal Corporation, Ors, Court, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, the High Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Learned Advocate, Sunil Kumar Sabharwal, Ors, LJ, High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Saibal Dey, O.P, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Legislature, Court, Family Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court
CARDINAL: 22.12.2004, 116, 1, 1, 14.9.2004, 3,000, 10,000, 20.12.2004, 22.12.2004, 3,000, 10,000, 3,000, 10,000, 1983CriLJ159, 1983CriLJ159, 3,000, 10,000, 40,000, 2,000, 2,500, 22.12.2004, 116, 2,000, 2,500, 1
DATE: 2004, 4.8.2003, that day, monthly, 2056, 2265, 14.9.2004, today, 14.9.2004, a very early date, 2004, a period of, three months, a period of, one month, December, 2004, arrear, two months, this day