Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Nilmani Kar and ors. Vs. Raja Sati Prasad Garga Bahadur and ors.

Decided On : Aug-27-1920

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 105, Section 52, Section 52(6, Section 52(6, Section 52(6, Section 52, Section 52(1, Section 50, Section 50, Section 52, Section 114, the Indian Evidence Act, the Full Bench, Section 52, Section 52.11, Section 64, Section 10, Section 52, Section 114, the Evidence Act, Section 52

PERSON: Asutosh Mookerjee, measurement.2, Ali v., Habibullah Khajeh Habibullah, Umed Ali, A.C. 107, Timed Ali v., Habibullah Khaseh Habibullah, Umed Ali, A.C. 107, Habibullah Khajeh Habibullah, Umed Ali, A.C. 107, Vagliano, A.C. 107, Kamalbasini Dasi, O.C.J., Maanaghten, Statutes, Statutes, Statute, Statute, Lard Halsbury, Statutes, A.C. 571, A.C. 571, Heydon, v. Brown, Morgan, L.J. Ch, Statutes, Wensleydale, L.J. Ch, Wensleydale, L.J. Ch, Selborne, Blackburn, Caleionian Ray, Fitzgerald, Clarke, Lord Bramwell, Hill, L.J. Ch, Cranworth, L.J. Ch, L.J. Ch, Watson, Robinson, Statutes, J., C.C. 143, Brougham, Tenancy, Tenancy, Tenancy, Tenancy, Abley, Dale, Timed Ali v. Habibulla, N.R. Chattbrjba, J.10, Pleader, Herschell, A.C. 571, E.R., L. J, L.J. Ch, Blackburn, Wear, Umed Ali v., Habibullah Khajeh, Ali 56 Ind. Cas, Richardson, J.11, Ghosh

CARDINAL: One, 6, 144, 60, 145, 64, 39, 657, 55, 144, 60, 145, 64, 39, 657, 55, 144, 60, 145, 64, 39, 657, 55, 6, 144, 60, 145, 64, 39, 657, 55, 23, 18, 6, 667, 6, 12, 374, 575, 67, 628, 79, 47, 152, 15, 476, 14, 527, 56, 38, 47, 266, 31, 144, 60, 145, 64, 39, 657, 55, 56, 38, 47, 266, 31, 575, 67, 628, 79, 47, 152, 15, 476, 14, 3, 7a, 76, 73a, 77, 1, 791, 89, 1178, 122, 84, 113, 36, 165, 1, 199, 305, 3, 7a, 76, 6, 1, 24, 332, 1, 481, 3, 191, 108, 1, 3, 43, 1, 623, 648, 106, 26, 473, 3, 823, 5, 454, 108, 19, 10, 519, 28, 948, 5, 7, 563, 115, 229, 11, 114, 121, 131, 29, 685, 354, 384, 52, 505, 48, 31, 418, 461, 53, 842, 51, 32, 925, 48, 1, 502, 605, 21, 405, 16, 483, 92, 42, 94, 20, 635, 17, 217, 51, 487, 61, 79, 67, one, two, one, 6, 6, 2, 480, 489, 6, 1, 98, 6, 18, 797, 21, 265, 16, 760, 118, 298, 28, 94, 5, 151, 7, 255, 8, one, two, one, 179, 187, 6, 19, 18, 667, 13, two, two-fold, two-fold, 6, 6, 6, 30, 6, 1, 11, 391, 20, 15, 87, 697, 138, 38, 47, 266, 31, two, two, 6, 6, 144, 60, 145, 64, 39, 657, 55, 38, 47, 266, 31, 575, 67, 628, 79, 47, 152, 15, 476, 14, 1, 1, 3, 7a, 76, 73a, 77, 6, 1, 24, 332, 1, 481, 3, 191, 108, 1, 3, 43, 743, 763, 47, 193, 37, 26, two, 38, 47, 266, 31, 6, 6, 1

ORDINAL: second, first, first, first, first, second, third

ORG: Court, L.P. 676, L.P. 676, L.P. 676, Appellate Decree, Court, Bench, Legislature, Herschell, Bank of England, L.P. 676The, Statute, Statute, Statute, the Judicial Committee, Norendra Nath Sarcar, the Lard Herschell, Statute, Eastman Photographic Materials Co., Comptroller General of Patents, Statute, Coke, C.L.J., L.P. 676, C.L.J., Parliament, B.R. 637, Heydon, B.R. 637, Howkins, Burton, Grey v. Pearson, Thellusson, West India Dock Co., B.R. 647, Canadian Pacific Ry. Co., A.C. 481, Statute, Legislature, Court, Tindal, C.J., Warburion v. Loveland, E.R. 806, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Coleridge, Pocock v. Ticketing, E.R., Legislature, Court of Justice, Campbell, Bell, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Statute, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Act.6, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Permanent Settlement, Legislature, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Legislature, C.J, C.L.J., the Rules of Court, Bank of England v. Vagliino, L.P. 676, the Judicial Committee, Norendra Nath Sarcar, C.L.J., Eastman Photographic Materials Co., Comptroller General of Patents, Design and Trade Marks, L.C, Statute, Heydon, Parliament, Turner, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court

DATE: 1891, 1891, 1891, 1890, 1898, 1891, 1898, 1581, 1613, 1027, 1920, 1558, 75 13, 1581, 1855, 1129, 1828, 1857, 6 H.L.C. 61, 1216, 1859, 7 H.L.C. 429, 1031, 1881, 1883, 1881, 1851-52, 1892, 1832, 1852, C.C. 97, twenty years, twenty years, 1793, 1851, 1012, 1)(a, 1907, 1891, 1898, 1883, 1888, 1581, 1613, 1027, 1855, 1129, 1877

WORK_OF_ART: L.T. 353, L.T. 353, L.T. 353, L.T. 353, L.T. 195, L.T. 353, L.T. 195, L.T. 651, L.T. 163, L.T. 505, L.T. 353, L.T. 195, L.T. 543

GPE: Umed Ali v., P.C., N.S., A.C., Saakey, Starding, N.S., N.S., N.S., W.R., Bradlaugh v., O.S., L.J.P.C., N.B., E.R., N.S., Crawford, E.R., E.R., Jervis, A.C., Halsbury, Hawkins v Gathercole, N.S., E.R., Quoting, case.10, J.12

NORP: Statute, Designs, North British, L.T, Statute, R., Statute, Designs, Statute

PRODUCT: L.T. 553, Cundry, the Full Bench

MONEY: 318, 318

FAC: Warburton v. Loveland, K.R. 172

QUANTITY: 6 App, 8 App

LOC: East

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //