Wilson-de-roze Vs. Wilson De Roze

Decided On : Aug-05-1929

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 14, the Indian Divorce Act, Section 31, Section 8, the Indian Divorce Act

NORP: J.1, British, Catholic

DATE: Friday, October, 1916, December, 1917, 1919, as early as 1918, the middle of 1919, October, 1919, about a year, 1927, 1920 to 1927, 1927, this year, May of this year, 1919, 1920, two years, 1925, 49, 1857, c. 85, 1869, the year succeeding, 1857, 1924, 1897, 1901, 1911, 1914, 1920 to 1927, 1924, 1909, 1910

GPE: India, Marsden Street, Tickner, Burdon v. Burdon, Tickner

ORDINAL: 3rd, second, second, second

CARDINAL: two, 25, 100, 8ection 178, 15, 20, 118, 123, 93, 39, 131, 22, 692, 40, 367, Two, 167, 66, 81, 77, 52, 118, 83, 88, 80, 19, 104, 277, 104, 83, 53, 110, 992, 58, 30, 392, 118, 123, 93, 39, 131, 22, 692, 40, 367, 1923.12

PERSON: Cove, Cove, Spry, Duke P., Tickner, J., Hampson, Hampson, Tickner

FAC: Karaya Road, Wellesley 2nd Lane, Bargrave Deane

ORG: Court, the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation, the Divorce Division of the High Court of Justice, English Court, L.J.P., L.G.R., Symons v. Symons, L.J.P., L.J.P., Gorell Barnee, Court, Court, Court, Court, L.J.P., Court, L.J.P., L.G.R., Court

PRODUCT: L.T. 159, L.T. 79, L.T., L.T. 159