Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Madhusudan Sarkar and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Decided On : Aug-08-2008

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 498-A/306, Section 306, Section 498-A, Section 306, Section 498-A/306, Section 306/498-A, Section 305/498-A, Section 498-A, Section 306, Section 306/498-A, Section 107, Section 107, Section 498-A, Section 113-A of Indian Evidence Act, Section 498-A, Section 306, the Explanation to Section 498-A, Section 113-A of the Evidence Act, Section 498-A, Section 306, Section 161, Section 134 of the Evidence Act, Section 32, the Evidence Act, Section 161, Section 306/498-A, Section 306/498-A, Section 306/498-A, Section 313

PERSON: Tapas, Kumar Giri, Kalna, Panchanan Das, Banalata Sarkar, O.C. Purbasthali, Banalata, Prangopal Sarkar, Banalata, I.O., Prangopal Sarkar, Prangopal Sarkar, Panchanan Das, Prangopal, Banalata, Banalata, Sankar Das, Doly Sarkar, Tulsi Sundari, Prankrishna, Madhusudan, Tulsi Sundari, Banalata, Satyaranjan Mistri, Amal Kumar, Roy, Kalindra Mitra, Malati Mitra, Swapna Mistri, Banalata, Purnima Acharyawas, C. Sengupta, S. Chatterjee, I.O., S. Biswas, Biswas, Banalata, Biswas, Banalata, Biswas, Kartar Singh, Kishori Lal v. State, Singh Sengar v. State of, Kumar Sharma, Harishchandra, Mohd, Hoshan, A.P. v. State of A.P.).23, Amajit Dey, Dey, Surender, S. Chatterjee, Banalata, Sushil Kumar Sharma, Banalata, IPC.27, Harjit Singh, Banalata, Tulsi Sundari, Madhusudan, Tulsi Sundari, Madhusudan, Banalata, Madhusudan, Prankrishna, Banalata, Tulsi Sundari, Banalata, Banalata, Banalata, Banalata, P.C., Tulsi, Tulsi Sundari, Madhusudan, Prankrishna, Madhusudan, Tulsi Sundari, Biswas, Devi Ram v. State, Haryana, Mohd, Hoshan A.P. v. State, Tulsi Sundari, Tulsi Sundari, Tulsi Sundari, Tulsi Sundari Sarkar, Kalna, Madhusudan Sarkar, Prankrishna Sarkar, Tulsi Sundari Sarkar, Tulsi Sundari, Kumar Banerjee

NORP: J.1, P.M., P.M., P.Ws, discharged.42

ORG: the Learned Assistant Sessions Judge, IPC, IPC, IPC, I.P., Banalata, Kalna Hospital, IPC, the I.O., the Learned Counsel, State, Banalata, Banalata, P.W. 1, Banalata, Banalata, P.W. 2.10, Banalata, Banalata, Banalata, P.W. 4, P.W. 7, hostile.12, Banalata, F.S.L. Report, Kalna Hospital, Kalna Hospital, Learned Advocate, Bhagwan Das v., AIR2007SC2457, Sanju, Union of India, Cri LJ 1724, State, Sections 306, IPC, Learned Advocate, Banalata, Banalata, F.S.L., Banalata, the Apex Court, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, Bhagwan Das, IPC, First - Instigates, Apex Court, IPC, Court, the Apex Court, IPC, IPC, IPC, Court, IPC, IPC, P.W. 1, P.W. 2, Banalata, Banalata, P.W. 2, P.W. 1 to, P.W. 2, Court, IPC, IPC, the Learned Advocate, the Trial Court, Trial Court, The Trial Court, LCR, the Trial Court, judgment.46, xerox

CARDINAL: 59, 19-8-1989, One, 25, 24-3-1986, 14, 13, thirteen, 19-8-1989, 1, 3, 5, 5, 6, 2007CriLJ3420, 2006CriLJ554, 2005CriLJ3439, 2002CriLJ4124, 498, 2, 210, 12, two, 1, 4, 6, two, 2002)10SCC76, 2002CriLJ4124, 42, 3, one thousand, 2, two, 15

DATE: 1989, seven and half years, another six months, about five years ago, about 22 years, 1987, 2007, 2007, '26, '30, 7 years, earlier.'32, 50 years, July, 1989, about 69 years, three) years, 1000/-, 19-8-1989, fifteen) days

PRODUCT: Rupees 3000/-, P.W. 2, P.W. 1, P.W. 5, P.W. 8, Smt, P.W. 9, P.W. 11, P.W. 12, P.W. 13, Cri LJ 779, P.W. 11, P.W. 12, P.W. 5, P.W. 3, P.W. 1 to, P.W. 3, P.W. 5, P.W. 5, P.W. 5, P.W. 5, P.W. 5, P.W. 5, P.W. 1,, P.W. 5, P.W. 9, P.W. 5, P.W. 5, P.W. 1, P.W. 5, P.W. 5.36, P.W. 1 to, P.W. 5

GPE: P.S., IPC.7, Nimai Datta, Singh v. State of Punjab, poison.25, Cr, P.C., Cr, Cr, P.C.

TIME: the next morning

ORDINAL: Secondly, second, first

FAC: Prankrishna, Prankrishna

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //