Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Crystal Cable Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Aug-14-2006

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 4, Section 22, Section 35, the Central Excise Act, Section 35F, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 22, Section 35F, Section 22, Section 22, Section 35, the Customs Act

PERSON: Indira Banerjee, hereinafter.3, Cables, Schedule, Howrah, Howrah, Howrah West Division-I, Tarafdar, Tarafdar, and/or penalty, and/or penalty, Tarafdar, undue hardship.48, Pranab Kr, Dutta, Dutta, Dutta, Dutta, Dutta, Dutta, Dutta, Dutta, Dutta, Dutta, and/or penalty

NORP: J.1, Central Excise, evidence.36

CARDINAL: 5, 2, 1996.6, 10, 1998.11, 1, 1, 2003(155)ELT13(SC, 1944.17, 3, 4, 5, 6, fit.(6, 21, 1944.22, 33, 2003(155)ELT18(Cal, 38, 1994(69)ELT193(Cal, 50, 280,60,11,977/-.51, 1991(53)ELT543(Cal, 1995(77)ELT433(SC, 12(SC, 2002(141)ELT614(Cal, 10, 2000ECR769(SC, 2003(154)ELT347(SC, 30, 65

DATE: 17th March, 2006, 8544, 1985, 1944, the year 1994-1995.5, 15th January, 1996, 15th January, 18th June, 1996, the year 1994-95, 15th January, 1996 onwards.8, 19th February, 1998, the financial year 1995-96, the financial year 1996-97, 1998, the financial years 1995-96, 1996-97, 19th February, 1998, 28th June, 2000, 2nd February, 2005, 2nd February, 2C05, 11th July, 2005, 8 weeks, 31stMarch 2005, 8 weeks, today, 1944, the 1stday of July, 2003, 1).Section 35L(b, 1944, 1985, 1963, 44, '46, 2005, 1997, 1995, 33, the year ending 31stMarch, 2005, 3 weeks

ORG: the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, CESTAT, Insulated Electric Wires, the Adjudicating Authority, Central Excise (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, documents.14, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Supreme Court, Metal Box India Ltd., CCD, SC, the High Court, the High Court, Appeal, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Court, The High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court.-An, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Tribunal under Section 35F, the Appellate Tribunal', the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, Court, Court, Court, Courts, Appeal, Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Supreme Court, Metal Box India Ltd., C.C.D., Metal Box India, the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Supreme Court, Metal Box India Ltd., CESTAT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Bongaigaon Refinery & Petrochem Ltd., Court, the Appellate Authority, Tribunal, Court, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Central Excise Gold Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT, CESTAT, Court, J.N. Chemicals, Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Government of India, Madras Rubber Factory Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Sriram Fertilizers, Chemicals v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, Government of India v. MRF Ltd., ELT, CESTAT, CESTAT, Hindustan Laminators Pvt, Central Excise, Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Vijay Packaging System Ltd., Customs, A.P., the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Appellant, the Board for Industrial and Financial Rconstruction, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Mehsana District Milk Pvt Ltd., Union of India, the Supreme Court, the Appellate Authority, CESTAT, CESTAT, Tribunal

FAC: Andul Road

PERCENT: 0.56%, 3.06%, 0.96%, 0.56%, 0.52%, 0.74%, 0.52%, 0.74%

GPE: Kolkata, Mumbai, assessment.19, Paragraph, Mumbai, penalty.42, Kolkata

WORK_OF_ART: Collector of Central Excise, Appellant

PRODUCT: Appellant, Calcutta, Appellant

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //