Secretary, Indian Tea Association Vs. Ajit Kumar Barat and ors.

Decided On : Mar-17-1999

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 12(5, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2-A of the, Section 12, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the I.D. Act, Section 10(1, Section 10(1, the Constitution Bench, Section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 10(1, Section 12(5, Section 2-A of the, Rule 12-A of the West Bengal Industrial Disputes Rules, Section 10(1, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 10(1, Section 2-A of the, Section 2-A of the, Section 2-A of the, Section 2-A of the, Section 2(k, Section 10(1, Section 12(5, Section 2-A of the, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 10(1, Section 10(1, Section 10(1, Section 29, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 10(1, Section 10(1, Section 10 and Section 12, Section 12(5, Section 10(1, Section 12(5, Section 10(1, Section 12, Section 10(1, Section 12(5, Section 2(s, Section 10(1, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 2-A, Section 11, Section 10(1, Section 2-A of the, Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2(s, Section 2(s, Section 2(k, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2-A of the Act

NORP: J.1, Joint

DATE: July 24, 1998, about July 2, 1997, 22878, 1997, January 14, 1998, 1947.'Being, January 14, 1998, 1953, 1964, 1979-I-, 1989, 1993, December 1, 1965, 1985, 1987, 1994, 1965, August 5, 1996, 1984, a period of, two months, today, 1963, to.14, January 14, 1997, an early date, later than one month

ORG: Court, Indian Tea Association, Court, Tribunal, the Hon'ble High Court, Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, the Appropriate Government, W.P. No, Court, the Appropriate Government, the Indian Tea Association, House Rent Subsidy, Furnishing Allowance, Servant, Monthly Club Subscription, Hospitality Expenses, Organisation, Industrial Tribunal/Court, Labour, the Appropriate Government, the Learned Trial, the Appropriate Government, the Appropriate Government, the State Government, Court, the Appropriate Government, the Appropriate Government, the Apex Court, State, SC, Haryana, Bombay Union of Journalists y. State, Avon Services, Industrial Tribunal, the Appropriate Government, the High Court, the Apex Court, Telco Convoy Drivers', State, the Telco Engineering, Locomotive Works Ltd., the Apex Court, the High Court, State, Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, SC, M.P. Irrigation, The State of M.P., SC, SC, Ors, SC, Bombay High Court, Labour (Conciliation, the Supreme Court, Judicial, Court, Validity, Reliance, Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd, Ors, Government, the Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, Industrial Dispute, the Statutory Authority, Court, the Apex Court, Barium Chemical Ltd., Company Law Board, the Apex Court, Magistrate, Apex Court, Government, Court, Government, the Appropriate Government, Bombay Union of Journalists and Ors, the Apex Court, Government, the Appropriate Government, the Apex Court, the Appropriate Government, Judicial, Avon Services, Industrial Tribunal, Faridabad and Ors, Apex Court, Tribunal, Appropriate Government, the Appropriate Government, the State Government, Court, the Appeal Court, State, Labour, the Appropriate Government, Court, Court, State, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Jugal Kishore, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, the Appropriate Government, the Appropriate Government, Court, the Apex Court, the Appropriate Government under Section 10(1, the Supreme Court, High Courts, Union of India and Ors, SC, Bombay Union of Journalists, The State of Haryana, The Apex Court, the Central Government, SC, CHANDRACHUD, the Apex Court, Labour, Apex Court, the High Court, Apex Court, Industrial Tribunal, the State Government, the High Court, Industrial Tribunal, Government, the High Court, the State Government, Industrial Tribunal, The State Government, the Industrial Tribunal, the Appropriate Government, the Appropriate Government, the State Government, the State Government, Court, the Appropriate Government, Court, the Supreme Court of India, the Appropriate Government, the Appropriate Government, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Comptroller & Auditor General, Court, the Appropriate Government, the State Government, the State Government, Court, S.N. Bhattachargee

PERSON: Shri Barat, Kumar Barat, justified?To, Child Allowance, Maintenance Allowance, Workman, Nos, Choudhury, Choudhury, Madras, C.P. Sarathy, Kumar v. State, Haryana, Choudhury, Choudhury, Mazdoor Sangh v. State of, Choudhury, Choudhury, Vekreta Kendra, Abad Dairy, Barat, Barat, Barat, Barat, Ram Avtar Sharma v. State, Mihir Kr, Hazra Chowdhury v. Union, V. Veerarajan, Tamil Nadu, Barat, Barat, Barat, Barat, him.8, Barat, Barat, Tamil Nadu, Labour Deptt, Charan Das v. State, Haryana, Anr, Choudhury, Choudhury, wherein, Choudhury, Nos, Hazra Choudhury, Anr, Ram Avtar Sharma v., Vikreta Kendra Sanchalak Mandal, Choudhury, Barat, Barat, Nos, Officers

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Ajit

GPE: the State of West Bengal, I.T., A.So, Bombay, Bihar, Nirmal, Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors, Haryana, Rohinton, Chaittannya, Madras v. C.R. Sarathi, Bombay, Kumar v. State, Mihir, Nirmal, Singh v. State of Punjab, India, J.:I agree

ORDINAL: first, third, firstly, first

CARDINAL: 1 to 4, three, 1976]3SCR1010, four, 1967]1SCR898, 1, 4, 1 to 4, 1988]2SCR910, one, Four, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1986]2SCR17, 200

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

EVENT: 1984-II-LLJ-396

QUANTITY: II-LLJ-187

MONEY: 1989-II, 1989-II, 1985-II