Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sri Ajay Prakash Lohia Vs. Sri Ashok Mittal and ors.

Decided On : Sep-05-2007

Court : Kolkata

LAW: the Companies Act, Section 66(1, the Income Tax Act, Section 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 100 of the Code, Section 103, Section 10F of the Companies Act, Section 10E, the Companies Act, Section 10F

PERSON: Sanjib Banerjee, Khimji v. Jayaben D. Kania, Fazal Ali, Paragraphs 32, company.10, necessity.14

NORP: J.1

PRODUCT: Sections 397, CA Nos

CARDINAL: 398, 131, 46, two, 1961]42ITR589(SC, 30, 31, 31, 1982]1SCR187, 120, 120, 36, about half

DATE: 1956, week, four weeks, 10.10.2007, 1922, 1956, 2006, June of 2006, less than a half percent, distinguished.11, a period of, six weeks

ORG: the Company Law Board, the Company-Law Board, CLB, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board Regulations, the Company Law Board, Tribunal, Bombay v. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Indian Income Tax Act, Tribunal, the Company Law Board, S.N., the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, The Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, C.P. No, the Company Law Board, Tribunal, Court, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, The Company Law Board, The Company Law Board, The Company Law Board, the Company Law Board

ORDINAL: seventh, first, second

TIME: 2:30 pm, 2:30

WORK_OF_ART: the Memorandum of Appeal

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //