Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Sri Ajay Prakash Lohia Vs. Sri Ashok Mittal and ors.
Decided On : Sep-05-2007
Court : Kolkata
LAW: the Companies Act, Section 66(1, the Income Tax Act, Section 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 100 of the Code, Section 103, Section 10F of the Companies Act, Section 10E, the Companies Act, Section 10F
PERSON: Sanjib Banerjee, Khimji v. Jayaben D. Kania, Fazal Ali, Paragraphs 32, company.10, necessity.14
NORP: J.1
PRODUCT: Sections 397, CA Nos
CARDINAL: 398, 131, 46, two, 1961]42ITR589(SC, 30, 31, 31, 1982]1SCR187, 120, 120, 36, about half
DATE: 1956, week, four weeks, 10.10.2007, 1922, 1956, 2006, June of 2006, less than a half percent, distinguished.11, a period of, six weeks
ORG: the Company Law Board, the Company-Law Board, CLB, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board Regulations, the Company Law Board, Tribunal, Bombay v. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Indian Income Tax Act, Tribunal, the Company Law Board, S.N., the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, The Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, C.P. No, the Company Law Board, Tribunal, Court, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, The Company Law Board, The Company Law Board, The Company Law Board, the Company Law Board
ORDINAL: seventh, first, second
TIME: 2:30 pm, 2:30
WORK_OF_ART: the Memorandum of Appeal