Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

North British and Mercantile Insurance Co. Vs. Re.

Decided On : Mar-20-1937

Court : Kolkata

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Rule 25, Section 8, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 18(5, Section 34, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Rule 27, Section 10, Section 18(4, Rule 25 or Rule 35, Rule 25, Rule 28, Rule 28, Rule 28, Rule 18, Rule 21, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Rule 25 to 35, Section 8, a tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 8, Section 18(3, Section 18(3, Section 34, Section 18(5).The, Section 31(3)(a, Rule 35, Rule 25, Section 8, Chapter III, Chapter III, the Income Tax Act, Chapter III, Section 8, Section 18, Section 2(11)(b, Chapter III, Section 18(5, Chapter III, Section 18, Section 48-A, Section 50.However, Section 18(3, the Indian Act

ORG: DERBYSHIRE, the Commissioner of Income Tax, the North British Mercantile Insurance Company, the Central Board of Revenue, Sec, the Indian Income Tax Act, Life Assurance Companies, Fidelity, Guarantee, Life Assurance Companies, Life Assurance Companies, Government of India, the Government of India, North British Company, Life Business, the Income Tax Officer, Company, the Life Business for the quinquennium, the London Actuary, Indian Taxation, Indian Life, Indian Life, Company, the Indian Life Profits, Indian Life, the Advocate-General, Sec, Sec, Income Tax, Life Assurance Companies, the Life Assurance Companies Act, Sec, the Life Assurance Companies Act, every Life Assurance Company, the Indian Income Tax Life, the North British Company, Consolidated Revenue Account, the Consolidated Revenue Account, Company, Indian Government Securities', the Consolidated Revenue Account, the Life Assurance Companies Act, the Life Assurance Companies Act, the Government of India, Sec, the Government of India, Income Tax, Sec, Sec, Life Assurance Companies, the Institute of Patent Agents v. Lockwood, The House of Lords, Sec, the Income Tax Officer, the Government of India, Hughes v. Bank of New Zealand, Treasury, Legislative, Crown, the Commissioner of Income Tax, the Life Assurance Company, the Government of India, a Life Insurance Company, the Indian Income Tax Act, the Government of India, case).Sub-Sec, the Government of India, Sec, the Commissioner of Income-tax, the Indian Income Tax Act, Mercantile Insurance Company Limited, Income Tax, Sec, Income Tax, Indian Life Insurance Business, Sec, sub-Sec, Sec, Company, Company, Company, Sec, Sections, Company, the Income Tax Officer, Company, Sec, Sub-Sec, Company, Appellant, Sec, Company, Company, Sec, the Income-Tax Act, the High Court, Company, Company, the Board of Inland Revenue, Sec, the Board of Inland Revenue Notification No, Sec, Crown, Income Tax, an Insurance Company, an Insurance Company, Insurance Companies, Act, Sec, Life Assurance, Sec, Sec, Sec, Crown, the Companys Life Insurance, Sec, the Income Tax Rules, Company, an Insurance Company, Life Insurance, Crown, Crown, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Crown, Life Insurance Company, Life Insurance, Dividing Society, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Advocate-General, Crown, Sec, Institute of Patent Agents, the House of Lords, Advocate-General, Sec, Life Assurance, Sec, Sec, Sec, M.R., Hughes, Bank of New Zealand, the Lords Justices, Court, the Bank of New Zealand, the Government of India, Mercantile Insurance Company,, Sec, Sec, Crown, Mercantile Insurance Company,, Sec, the Indian Income Tax Act, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Sec, Indian Income Tax Act, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta, the Central Board of Revenue, The Central Board, Insurance Companies (Life, Marine, Fidelity, Guarantee, Life Assurance Companies, Life Assurance Companies, Life Assurance Company, Life Assurance Companies, the Life Assurance Business, the Indian Life Business of the, the Fire Business, Sec, Sec, Court, a Life Assurance Company, the Central Board of Revenue, Sec, a Life Assurance Company, a Life Insurance Company, Sec, Crown, the Government of India, Sec, Sec, Sec, Sec, Sec, Life Insurance Company, the Phoenix Assurance Company Limited, Hughes v. Bank of New Zealand, Sec, the London Branch, the Court of Appeal, Sec, Sec, Advocate-General, Life Insurance, Company, Advocate-General, Sec, Court, Crown, The Advocate-General, Life Assurance Companies, The Central Board of Revenue, Board, Crown, Sec, Interest on Securities', Sec, Indian Income Tax Act, Sec, the Income Tax Officer, Sec, Sec, Sec, Sec, Income Tax, United Provinces, Sec, Sec, Sec, Sec, Sec

CARDINAL: two, 25, 59, 35, 3,63,33,489Claims.76,52,860Surrenders, 1-5th, 26,24,835, 5,24,97'The, 8,32,858It, 'One-fifth, 1,66,572, 1,66,572, 8, 25, 25, 8, 7, 8(1, 3, 3, 8, 25, 59, 5, 25, 8, 360, two, 25, 8, one-fifth, 46, 1, 2, 3, 1, 18, 3, 5, two, 3, 5, 18, 25, 3, 1922.'In, Two, two, 34, 5,24,967, one-fifth, 8,32,860, one-fifth, 1,60,572, 6,90,883, 1,66,572, 26, 7,100-7, 17,715-2, 88,715-9, 1,16,953-1, 6, 18, 5, 1,16,953-1-6, 51,332-6, 65,620-11, 5, 28,202, 37,418-3, 18, 5, 51,332-6, 1,16,953-1-6, 1,16,953-1-6, 25, 25, 32 1/2, 25, 59, 3, 25, 10, 12, 30, 25, 18(4, 6 and so, 25, 22(1, 18, 18, 5, 59, one, 360, two, 25, 35, 10, 25, 5, 18, 10, 8, one, 3, 8, two, 5, 25, 35, 25, 25, 25.Whether, 25, a fifth, One, one-fifth, one-fifth, one-fifth, one-fifth, one-fifth, 81,414-8-1, 51,332-6, one-fifth, one-fifth, 1,66,572.The, four, Three, three, 1, 59, 1, 3, 1, 18, 5, one-fifth, 59(2)(a)(ii, 25, 3, 6.It, 8, 25, 6, 8, one, one, 3, almost one-fifth, 46(1, 6, 1,66,572, 5,24,967, 6, two, 5, 2, 1922.'This, 3, 34, 1-5th, 23, 23, 34, 1, 2

ORDINAL: first, second, sixth, first, second, second, second, first, fourth, first, second, second, first, second, third, second, first, third

DATE: 35, 1922.Rule 25, annual, 1922, the year 1934-35, 1926-30, the June 5, 1934, 1926-30 - Indian Business, January 1, 1926, December 31, 1931-32, 1926-1930, 1926-30, 7,32,488, 1922, 35, 1912, each financial year, every five years, the.....years, 1926-1930, the June 15, 1934, 1912, 1894, annual, 1918, any year, the following year, the following year, 35, the years 1932-33, 1933-34, 1934-35, the last two years, the year 1932-33', the year 1934-35, three years, the previous year, the tax year ending the December 31, 1933, January 1, 1933, December 31, 1933, the year 1934-35, 5,24,311, the year, the year ending the December 31, 1933, 18, the following year, 18, the year ending the December 31, 1933, 1934 - 35, the year, that year, 1934-35, 1934-35, the March 13, 1935, 35, 1922, the April 1, 1922, 1922, Secs. 6, Rule 25, annual, annual, 18, 35, the particular year, 1922, the year ending 19, annual, Secs. 6 to 12, Rule 24, Rule 31, annual, 1003, 1922, 1922, 35.Rule 25, annual, the number of years, 35, the year 1932-33, five years, the year 1933, the year, the year ending March 31, 1933, the year, 34, the previous year i.e., the accounting year January 1, 1931, December 1, 1931, the year of assessment, 1932-33, 1933-34, 1934-35, 1932-33, the years 1932-33, 1933-34, 1934-35, 1932-33.The, any year, 1922, any year, each year, the previous year, the previous year, annual, annual, five years, 35, 1918, the three years, the year, the accounting year, the following year, the twelve months ending, the last day of the year, the beginning of the year, the previous year', the preceding year, a year, 'average year', previous years, 18, 1932-33, 34, the year, the preceding year, the financial year ending March 31, 1933, 34, 34, 34, 34

NORP: British, Indian, Indian, Indian, British, Indian, Designs, North British, Indian, British, British, Rules, British, Indian, Indian, Rules, North British, North British, Indian, Indian, Indian, British, British, Indian, Indian, Indian, British, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

GPE: India, Burglary, India, India, India, India, Counsel, India, A.C., the United Kingdom, India, India, India, HERSCHELL, L.C., India, Bengal, Great Britain, Burglary, India, India, India, Sec, London, India, India, India, India

FAC: Bonus, Fourth Schedule, the Gazette of India

PERSON: 48,08,196, 48,08,196, Patents, Herschell, L. C., Dunedin, 48,08,196, Green, Sec, JUSTICE WILLS, Joseph Lockwood, LORD WRIGHT, Isaacs, Schedule, Rules 18, Sec, Satyendra Mohan Roy Chaudhari, Seth Kasinath Bagla v.

LOC: the Fourth Schedule, British India

MONEY: 40 per cent, 5 per cent

WORK_OF_ART: The Queen v. Bird and Others : Ex parte Needs, Life and Fire Business, Life Assurance Companies

EVENT: this War Loan

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //