Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Chandra Sekhar Prasad Sinha Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Decided On : Jul-06-2006

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 498A and Section 379, the Indian Penal Code, Rule 28, Section 24, the Indian Penal Code, Section 13, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 24, Section 24, Rule 28(b, Rule 28(9){viia, Section 24

PERSON: Indira Banerjee, Bani Vidyalaya High School, hereinafter.3, Indu Devi, Chapra, P.K. Chattopadhyay, Indu Devi, Renu Devi.10, Rules 28(8, Bhattacharya, Rule 28(9)(viia, teacher.27, Rule 28(9)(viia, withdrawn.30, Mansoor Alam

NORP: J.1, Rules

ORG: him.2, the Managing Committee, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Managing Committee, Institution, the Court of the 6th Additional District Judge, W.P. 4496, the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, Board, West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, Committee, the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, the Managing Committee, hereinbelow:(c, Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate of Chapra, Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case, Court, xerox, the Court of the 6th Additional District, Chapra, Court, the Management of Recognized Non-Government Institutions (Aided and Unaided) Rules, Committee, Board, Committee, Committee, Board, Committee, Board, Committee, Committee, Board, the Committee for the action, Committee, Board, Board, Committee, Board, Committee, Committee, Institution, Board, Committee, Board, Board, Committee, the Criminal Case, The Managing Committee, the Managing Committee, the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, elapsed.23, the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, Committee, the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, Committee, the Managing Committee, Committee, Committee, inter alia, the Managing Committee, the Managing Committee, the Managing Committee, Committee, the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, The Managing Committee, the Managing Committee, xerox

GPE: Burnpur, Burdwan, Opposition.12, Affidavit, withdrawn.25, petitioner.33, costs.35, Md.

DATE: about 29th November, 1999, about 26th June, 1991, over 7 years, 8th November, 1999, November, 1999, 14th January, 2000, 29th November, 1999, 2000, 13th March, 2002 of His Lordship the Hon'ble, 4th, December, 2002, 1963, 26 June, 1991, 1999, 2nd January, 2003, 1956, 4th December, 2002, 1969, ninety days, seven days, a period of ninety days, one year, 90 days, the expiry of ninety days, 1963, 1969, November, 2000, 90 days, 90 days, about 65 days, one month, 90 days, almost seven years, November, 1999, one year, 22nd November, 1999, 90 days, the 21st June, 1982, 90 (ninety) days, 90 (ninety) days, years, 1963

CARDINAL: 1961.4, 5, 5, one, one, 504, 506, 497, 120B, 3/4, 5, 28(8a, 28(8b, 28(9){viia, one, 8).(8b, one, 90, 28(8b

ORDINAL: 9th, 6th, first, 3rd

PRODUCT: 323, Judgment, years.34

LOC: Paragraph 5, Affidavit

TIME: 48 hours, 48 hours

PERCENT: fifty percent, seventy-five percent

EVENT: the 1969 Rules by Notification No, the 1969 Rules, the 1969 Rules, the 1969 Rules, the 1969 Rules

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //