Parle Products Limited Vs. Subir Mukherjee

Decided On : Jun-23-2000

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 30, Section 4, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 92-A, Section 92-A, Section 92, Section 3

ORG: S.B. Sinha, Railway, Tribunal, the Apex Court, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Schedule II, the Armed Forces of the Union, Act, Armstrong Withworth & Co., Northumbrian Shipping Co. Ltd., the Assam High Court, Assam Railways and Trading Co. Ltd., Court, the Supreme Court of India, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., AIR 2000, The Apex Court, Court, Sections, Parliament, Gauhati High Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Sitbiia Gope and Ors, the Apex Court, the Apex Court

NORP: J.1

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act

GPE: Puri, Puri, us, Mcculhum, U.S., Battery Charger, Smt

DATE: June 27, 1998, 1998, only 23 years old, monthly, 1920, 1932, 1930, 1988, 1939, 2000-1-LLJ-1656, 2000, 1997, 1976)IILLJ266SC, '15

PRODUCT: Calcutta

PERSON: Jagannath Express, Roy, E.S.I. Corpn., Francis De Costa, Arunava Ghosh, Workman, Redford, Cardillo v. Liberty, Saraswati Devi, Rita Devi, Anr, E.S.I. Corpn, Francis De Costa, Francis De Costa, Pawan Kr Dubey, LLJ:'7, H. Banerji

TIME: the night of

PERCENT: 20%

CARDINAL: two, 1, 2, 1, 6, 2:7, 780, 147, 361, 330, One, 96, 2)(b)(ii, 12, 43, 2, 13, 269, One, two

LANGUAGE: English

FAC: AIR 1963 Assam 127

QUANTITY: one kilometer