Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Bata India Ltd. Vs. E.S.i. Corporation
Decided On : Mar-17-1989
Court : Kolkata
LAW: the Factories Act, Section 1(4, Section 1(5, Section 1(5, Section 1, Section 2(9, Section 38, Section 2(9, Section 2(9, the E.S.I. Act, the E.S.I. Act, the E.S.I. Act, Section 2(9, Section 2(9, Act 44 of 1966, Section 2(9, Section 39, Section 38, Section 2(12
ORG: Susanta Chatterji, the Bata India Limited, the Head Office of the Company, Sales Office/Sales Organisation, Bata India Limited, Batanagar, Batagunge and Faridabad, Employees State Insurance Act, Government, Government, the E.S.I. Corporation, Government, the State Government, the Central Government, Employees State Insurance Act, Head Office, Head Office, Sales Offices, the Head, Branch Offices, Sales Shops, Sales Depot/Office, Employees State Insurance Act, Head Office, Sales Office, Sales Shops/Depot, Scheme, Scheme, the Head Office, Sales Office, Sales Shops and Depot, inter alia, Company, Bata, E.S.I, E.S.I, Court, Court, AIR 1983 SC Page 27, the Head Office, the Head Office/Sales Office and/or, Court, Court, Sale
NORP: J.1, Mandamus
PERSON: Rule, Shakespeare Sarani, Shakespeare Sarani, S. N. Banerjee Road, Gazette, Notification, Ginwalla, Act.4, E.S.I. Act.6, Ginwalla, Counsel, Batanagore, Counsel, Mukherjee, Hyderabad Asbestos v. Employees Insurance Court, Ginwalla
CARDINAL: 7, 30, three, three, three, two, 1, 1985ECR4(SC, 204.9, 1978)ILLJ181SC, 28, 2(9, 2(12, 39
DATE: 1948, 1948, 1948, the year 1966, 6 months', 38
PRODUCT: Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta
GPE: States, India, Batanagar, States, India, Batanagar, E.S.I., Counsel, E.S.I., Counsel, E.S.I.
ORDINAL: first
WORK_OF_ART: Batagunge and Faridabad