Ladhuram Taparia Vs. B. K. Bagchi. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Feb-26-1951

Court: Kolkata

LAW: Section 45, Constitution, Section 29, the Indian Partnership Act, Section 26A, Section 26A of the Act, Section 29, the Indian Partnership Act, Section 30, Section 26A., Section 45, Section 30, Section 30, Section 136 and Section 137, Section 157, Section 45, the Indian Act, Section 45, the Indian Act, Section 45, Section 45, Section 45, Section 45, Section 33A of the Act, Section 29

GPE: India, Bhairodan, Rex v. Special Commissioners, Cairns, Oxford, Bombay

PERSON: Ladhuram Taparia, Ganpat Rai, Jagawarmal Hanuman Buz, Jagannath Harnarain, Ganpat Rai Jorawarmal, Seth Ladhuram Taparia, Ladhuram Taparia, Pal, Pal, Elmhirst, Simon - Income-Tax, Vol, L. C., Gupta, Moti Lal v. Uttar

DATE: the 28th of February, 1941, the 16th of October, 1941, the 19th July, 1943, the year, 1942-43, the years, 1943-44, 1944-45, the year 1945-46, the 29th of March, 1950, the 30th March, 1950, the 20th April 1950, the 29th of March, 1950, the same assessment year 1945-46, the 20th of April, 1950, the 19th of June 1950, the 20th April, 1950, the 20th April, 1950, the 21st August, 1950, the 20th April, 1950, the 30th March, 1950

ORG: Ladhuram, un, Seth Ladhuram Taparia & Co., Messers, Appellate, Appellate, the House of Lord, Reliance, Julius v. Bishop, Julius v. Bishop, Oxford, Judicial, Alcock Ashdown & Co., the Chief Revenue Authority, the High Court, the Privy Council, the Chief Revenue Authority, the Revenue Authority, Advocate-General, the Advocate-General, the Advocate-General, Court, Bishop Of London

CARDINAL: 8, 4, five, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8,67,239-10, five, four, five, five, 1, 309, 201, 33,105, five, five, five, six, one, 11

ORDINAL: first

LANGUAGE: English

TIME: 8,67,239