Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Koenigsberger Vs. Richmond Silver Mining Co.

Decided On : Apr-22-1895

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Page 158 U. S. 46 , Constitution, section 23, the Constitution of the United States, Constitution, section 21, section 22, section 23

PERSON: Koenigsberger, Koenigsberger v., Koenigsberger, Victor Dorne, Dorne, Sebastian Koenigsberger, Carr, Ames, Barney v. Baltimore, Benner, Freeborn v. Smith, Baker, Morton, Morgan, Gibson v. Bruce, Keith, Dorne, Herman, McKinney, Miller, Blackburn v. Wooding, Strasburger, Beecher, Dunton, Nickerson, Crook, Carson v. Donaldson, Johnson, Justice Miller, Dillon, c. 147, Ames, Justice Miller, Bates, Payson, Kennon, Hopkins, Kennon, Harmon

ORG: Richmond Silver Mining Co., U.S. Supreme Court, Richmond Silver Mining Co., U.S. 41, Richmond Silver Mining Company, Syllabus, the Territory of Dakota, Supreme, District Courts, the Circuit Court, the Territory of Dakota, the State of South Dakota, the supreme court, Court, the District Court, the Richmond Silver Mining Company, the Supreme Court of the Territory of Dakota, the Territory of Dakota, Congress, the Supreme Court, the State of South Dakota, the Circuit Court, the State of New York, the Territory of Dakota, the State of South Dakota, The Circuit Court, the Supreme Court, the State of South Dakota, Court, Court, the Circuit Court, Court, the Territory of Dakota, the State of South Dakota, the State of South Dakota, the State of New York, the supreme court, the supreme court, Page 158 U. S. 47 , the supreme court, the supreme court, Congress, Congress, Court, Congress, Court, Congress, Express Co., Kountze, The Circuit Court, the District Court, Court, the supreme court, Court, the supreme court, the supreme court, the supreme court, Clarke, Kellam, Congress, the State of South Dakota, the State of New York, the State of South Dakota, the Eighth Circuit, Richmond Co., the Circuit Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit, Muth, Bunker Co., the supreme court, Congress, the supreme court, the supreme court, the supreme court, Fifth National Bank, Bank v. Ashley, Northern Pacific Railroad, Arkansas Co., Mann, Washington & Georgetown Railroad v., SEC, the Ninth Judicial Circuit, SEC, the Supreme Court, the supreme court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the supreme court, the Territory of Dakota, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the State of South Dakota, the Supreme Court, the State of North Dakota, the Supreme Court of the Territory of North Dakota, the supreme court, the supreme court, the Supreme Court, SEC, SEC, Congress

GPE: U.S., U.S., the United States, the United States, the United States, the District of South Dakota, Lawrence County, Lawrence County, South Dakota, Dakota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Washington, the United States, the District of South Dakota, South Dakota, the United States, the District of South Dakota, the United States, the District of South Dakota, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, Colorado Railroad, South Dakota, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, New Orleans, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the District of South Dakota, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, Colorado, Colorado Railroad, the United States, the United States, the United States, Colorado, New York, Washington, Montana, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the District of North Dakota, the United States, the United States, United States, the United States, the United States

DATE: 1895, 1895, April 4-5, 1895, April 22, 1895, February 22, 1889, October 17, 1883, December 11, 1882, three weeks, April, 1889, September 28, 1889, October 8, 1889, the same day, November 2, 1889, February 22, 1889, February 4, 1890, March 1, 1890, ten days, February 22, 1889, Winter, February 22, 1889, June 26, 1876

CARDINAL: 158, 260, 220, 158, 180, two, half, half, 14,285 5/7, 3,500, 19,000, 20,000, 10,785 5/7, 180, two, 1, 20, 43, one-half, one-half, one-half, one-half, one-half, 251, 180, 25, 683, 91, 6, 280, 511, 235, 2, 160, 8, 342, 12, 150, one, 2, 290, 12, 164, 873, 1, 43, 43, 1, 56, 44, 209, 45, 45, 658, 45, 46, 8, 19, 62, 4, 250, 258, 412, 4, 265, one-half, half, half, half, 2, 327, 21, one, 22, 23, one, 25, 682-684

ORDINAL: First, third, first, second, Eighth

MONEY: 15,000, one to two dollars, fifty cents, 15,315.70, 8,823.96, one to two dollars, half a dollar

PERCENT: seven percent, 156 U. S. 494 , 26 U. S. 546 , 147 U. S. 571

PRODUCT: Canter

WORK_OF_ART: 9 How, Dakota Code of Civil Procedure

EVENT: N.D. 1

LOC: the District of South Dakota

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //