Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Hohorst Vs. Hamburg-american Packet Co.
Decided On : Mar-27-1893
Court : US Supreme Court
PERSON: Hohorst, Hohorst, Hohorst, CHIEF, Friedrich Hohorst, Henry R. Kunhardt, Henry R. Kunhardt, Jr., George H. Diehl, Arend Behrens, William Koester, Henry R. Kunhardt, Henry R. Kunhardt, Henry R. Kunhardt, Jr., George H. Diehl, Behrens, William Koester, Justice Nelson, Nelson, Holcombe v. McKusick, Dayton, Frow, Montgomery v. Anderson, Hill, Shaw
ORG: Hamburg-American Packet Co. -, U.S. Supreme Court, Hamburg-American Packet Co., Hamburg-American Packet Company No, Syllabus, Court, the State of New York, the Hamburg-American Packet Company, Page 148 U. S. 263 , the State of New York, the State of New Jersey, the Circuit Court, the Hamburg Company, Kunhardt & Co., Hamburg Company, Page 148 U. S. 264 , the Hamburg Company, Court, Girault, Court, Court, the Common Pleas, the Common Pleas, Peet v. McGraw, Court, Chicago & Evanston Railroad, Quincy Mining Co., the Circuit Court, Court
GPE: U.S., U.S., NEW YORK, the United States, the United States, the Kingdom of Hanover, Empire, Germany, the City of New York, Sr., the United States, the United States, the United States, New York, Sr., the City and County of New York, the City and County of New York, Sr., the City and County of New York, United States, the United States, Mississippi, Mississippi, New York, England, United States, Withenbury, United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, New York
DATE: 1893, 1893, March 13, 1893, March 27, 1893, September 15, 1888, September 17, November 5, 1888, December 18, 1888, December 24, January 7, 1889, January 28, 1889, February 2, 1889, February 16, 1889, February 21, April, 1889, April 11, 1889, 38
CARDINAL: 148, 134, 148, 262, 38, 273, 11, 22, one, 11, 21, 667, 20, 552, 131, 15, 552, one, one, 5, 819, 21, 386
LOC: the Southern District, the Southern District
FAC: the Hamburg-American Packet Company, the Hamburg-American Packet Company
WORK_OF_ART: Metcalfe's Case
PERCENT: 145 U. S. 444