Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Haripada Dutta Vs. Ananta Mandal

Decided On : Sep-04-1951

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution and, Article, Article 227, section 18, Article 227 of the Constitution and, the Bargadars- Act, Article 237 of the Constitution, the Bargadars Act, Article 227, Article 136, Constitution, Article 136, Article 136, Article 227, Article 227, Section 107, Section 224 of the Act of 1935, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227.11, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article, Article 227, Article 227, the Motor Vehicles Act, Article in 'SABITRI MOTOR SERVICE LTD, the Rent Control Act, Article 227, the Bargadars Act, Article 227, Section 10, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Explanation to Section 7(2, Section 5(1, Section 5(2, Section 10(1, Section 10(2, the Evidence Act, Section 10, Section 7(2, Section 7(3, Section 14, Section 15, Section 11, Rule 12, Article 227, Section 9(1, Section 2(e, Article 227, Constitution, Section 107, Article 227, Article 227, Article 226, Article 227, Article, Section 115, Article 527, Article 227, Article 227, Section 18 of the Act, Section 18, Section 18, Section 18, the Estate 10 or, the Bargadars Act, Rule 12, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227, Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution vests this Court, Section 224, Section 107, Section 15, the Charter Act, Section 15, the Charter Act, Section 107, Section 224 of the Government pf India Act, Constitution, Article 227, Section 224, Article 227, Constitution, Article, Constitution, Constitution, Article 227.That, Article, Article, Article, Article 136, Article 227.28, Constitution, Article, Constitution, Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution every High Court, Article, Article, Constitution, Constitution, Article, Article, Article 227.Only, Article 227, Article, Article 227, Article 227, Section 19, Article 227.31, Section 6 of the Act, Section 7, Rule 3, Section 7, Section 10, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 10, Section 10, Section 14, Section 15, Rule 13, Section 11, Rule 10, Rule 11, Section 12(1, Rule 12, Section 12(2, Article 227.33, Article 227, Article

ORG: Chakravartti, Conciliation, Board, Appellate, Court, Bargadars, the Goseba Bhagchas Conciliation Board, Bhag, Bhag, Board, Board, Bargadar, Appellate, the Opposite Party, Bargadar, Landowner, Bargadar, the Opposite Party, Estate, the Opposite Party, Bargadar, Board, Court, Board, Courts, Board, Court, Court, the Bhagchas Conciliation Board, Bhagchas Conciliation Board, Appellate, Board, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court Report, Mahajan J.,'in, the Government of India Act, the Article Courts, Courts, the High Court, High Courts, the Government of India Act, Courts, COOPER v. WANDSWORTH BOARD OF WORKS', State, MACLEAN, Union, the Privy Council, GITTENS, Cal W N 124, the Original Jurisdiction of the High Courts, the High Courts, The Government of India Act, the High Court's, State, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, State, Division, the Appellate Authority, Cal W N 81, Appellate Court, Cal W N 611, State, State, Conciliation Board, a Conciliation Board, the 'Board, Board, Board, Board, Board, Board, Bargadar, Board, Bargadar, Board, Board, Board, Board, Court.14, Board, Board, Board, Board, Appellate, Board, Appellate, Court, Board, Court, Board, Appellate, Court, Court, the High Court, the Government of India Act, the High Court, High Court, Court, Court, Bargadar, The Board, the Appellate Officer, Appellate, Estate, Bargadar, the Bengal Tenancy Act, Appellate, Board, Board, Appellate, Board, Board, Board, Board, Board, Board, the Opposite Party, the Bhagchas Conciliation., Appellate, Bargadar, the Government of India Act, the Government of India Act, the Government of India Act, the High Court's, the High Court's, the High Courts, the High Court's, the High Court, Court, the supreme judiciary, High Courts, the Supreme Court, Counsel, the High Courts, Sections 3, the Bhagchas Conciliation Board, Appellate, the Bhagchas Conciliation Board, the State Government, Board, Sections 3, 4 & 5, Board, Board, a Civil Court, Board, Board, Board, Board, Board, the State Government, Board, Board, Appellate, the State Government, State, inter alia, Board, Appellate, Board, the Appellate Officer, State, Griffith, HUDDARD PARKER & CO., MOOREHEAD, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, the Supreme Court, the Board of, COOPER, Court, Appellate

NORP: J.1, Rules, Barga

DATE: 1950, the 16th April, 1950, the last 16 or 18 years, annually, the previous year, 1951, 1950, 1915, 1935, 1863, 1929, 1935, 1950, 1915, 10 or 12 years ago, 10 or 12 years ago, three weeks, fifteen-days, 1950, 1935, 1915, 1861, 1915, 1935, January 26, 1950, '26, 1935, 1950, 1950, 4, 8, 5, 6, 9, 4, Rule 13, 1909, 1931, 1950, 1937

PERSON: Sudhangsupur, Parganas, Daniel Hamilton Estate, Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, C. J. and Das, J., Sen Gupta, J., Sastri J., Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, Maugham J., Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, Gupta, P. C. GUHA v. B. A. BASIL', Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, Bargadar, Gupta, Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, P.N. Mookerjee, J.22, Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, Articles, Anpe1, C. J.

GPE: the District of, paddy, Rule.6, Harries, immaterial.10, England, India, England

CARDINAL: 24, about 15, one, 405, 19-6-1951, two, 14, 180, 194, 1, 602, 54, 2, 55, 55, 7(2, one, two, two, one, 3, 2).20, two, One, 9, 9, two-fold, two, 459, one, 459, 227, 2, 12, 12, 1, 13, 3, 5, 2, 6, 7, 2))-has, 1, 9, one, 2, 8, 357, 275, 295, 296, 459, 2, 340

EVENT: Nayeb

ORDINAL: second, third, second, first, first, second

PRODUCT: Articles, Section 7(3, Sections 9 and 18

FAC: the Field Book

LOC: Articles 136

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //