Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Krementz Vs. S. Cottle Company
Decided On : Apr-10-1893
Court : US Supreme Court
PERSON: Krementz, Krementz, Krementz, George Krementz, Robert Stokes, John Keats, George Krementz, Fig, Fig, Fig, Fig, Figs, Krementz, Stokes, Keats, Krementz, Keats, Krementz, Krementz, Stokes, Keats, Krementz, Krementz, JUSTICE BROWN, Higgins, Webster, Magowan, Gandy, Augur
GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., NEW YORK, the United States, New York, the United States, Newark, N.J., Figs, Cottle, MR
DATE: 1893, 1893, March 23, 1893, April 10, 1893, May 6, 1884, January 4, 1876, May 9, 1876, May 6, 1884, 3, 4, January 4, 1876, May 9, 1876, April 16, 1878, 105 U. S. 580, years
ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, S. Cottle Company, The S. Cottle Company No, Syllabus, Page 148 U. S. 557 , Court, the Circuit Court, Thomson's Unbreakable Busk Fastening, Consolidated Brake-Shoe Co., Detroit Co., Loom Co., Court, Consolidated Valve Co., Crosby Valve Co., New York Belting Co., Barbed-Wire Patent, Main Belting Co., Court
CARDINAL: 148, 161, 148, 298,303, 171,882, 177,253, 298,303, 39, 323, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 1, 2, 5, two, 171,882, 177,353, one, two, two, one, 47, more than forty, two
LOC: the Southern District
ORDINAL: first, fifth, first
QUANTITY: fifty yards
PERCENT: 113 U. S. 157 , 141 U. S. 332 , 145 U. S. 156
PRODUCT: Topliff v.