Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Kanailal Mitra Vs. Pannasashi Mitra
Decided On : May-21-1954
Court : Kolkata
LAW: Act 18 of 1937, Act 11, Order 22, Rule 5, Order 22, Order 22, Rule 5, Section 115, Section 3 of that Act, Section 3, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 2 of the Act, Section 3, Section 3, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2 ofthat Act
PERSON: Lahiri, Gagan, Chandra Mitra, Pannasashi Mitra, Kanailal Mitra, Pannasashi, Pannasashi, Kanailal Mitra, Kanailal Mitra, Ghose, Brif Jivanlal v. Shiam Lal', Civil P. C., Chose, Pannasashi, Pannasashi, Chunder J., Manmatha Nath', Gagan, Chandra Mitra, Lakshmi Achi', Varadaehariar J., Mayne, 11th Edn., Chunder J., --'Akoba Laxman v. Sai Genu Laxman', Viswanatha Sastri J., Rajamannar C. J., Sastri J., Pannasashi, Pannasashi Mitra, Pannasashi Mitra, Pannasashi Mitra, J.8
NORP: J.1, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu
CARDINAL: One, 5, 28-6-1951, 27, 13-3-1954, 13-3-1954, One, 32, 704, 3, 204
DATE: the year, 1938, 1937, 1937, 1937, 1937
ORG: the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, the Allahabad High Court, Court, Court, the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, Pannashashi, the Dayabhaga School of Hindu Law, the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, the Dayabhaga School ofHindu, the Dayabhaga School, the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, the Federal Court, the All India Reporter, Legislature, the Federal Court, the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, Dayabhaga School of Hindu, the Dayabhaga School of Hindu law.5, the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, Sections 2, the Bombay High Court, Mottayya Mudaliar', the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, Maxwell, the Federal Court, the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act ', the Hindu Women's
WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate, Subordinate, Subordinate, Subordinate, Subordinate, Subordinate, Subordinate, Subordinate, Subordinate
ORDINAL: first, first
GPE: pp
PRODUCT: the Full Bench