Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Pankajkumar Ghose Vs. Sudheerkumar Shikdar

Decided On : May-22-1933

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 15, Order 3, Rule 4, Order 3, Rule 4

ORG: Ag, Suit No, Court, Court, Letters Patent, Court, Bar, Court, Court, Court, Supreme Court, Practice of the Civil Courts, Nagender, the Old Supreme Court, the late Supreme Court of Calcutta, the Calcutta Bar, Bench, Court, Court, Basanta Kumar Mitter, Court, J.

PERSON: Pankajkumar Ghosh, Lort-Williams, J., Sudheerkumar Shikdar, Pankajkumar Ghosh, Sudheerkumar Shikdar, Babu P. L. Mitter, Babu P. L. Mitter, Lort-Williams, J., Lort-Williams, J., Sudheerkumar Shikdar, P. K. Ghosh, P. L. Mitter, P. K. Ghosh, lien, Sudheerkumar Shikdar, Sudheerkumar Shikdar, P. K. Ghosh, Lort-Wil-liams, J., Civil P. C. Order, Civil P. C, Belchamber, Ghose v. Greenderchunder Ghose, Bel, Sale, J., Kusum Kumar Mitter, Sale, Lort-Wiiliam J., Lort-William's, Sudheerkumar Shikdar, Ghosh, J.6

DATE: 18th November 1932, 1528 of 1926, 8th March 1932, 18th November 1932, nearly 15 years, 1858, 1900, ten days

CARDINAL: one, 28 and 29, 22, three, 1, 340, 4

GPE: pp, Pankaj

ORDINAL: first, secondly

PRODUCT: Calcutta, 767

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //