Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The East Indian Railway Company Vs. Changa Khan and ors.

Decided On : Jan-13-1915

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 75 of the Railways Act, Section 75, the Railways Act, the English Act, the Indian Act

CARDINAL: 1, 416-5, 138-2, 100, 100, 100, two, 138, 100, 17, 224, 16, two, 19, 1.5, 100, 6, 12, 13 a dozen, 15, 100, more than half, less than half, 33, 187, 889, 10, 181, 9, 12, 380, 2, half, one, 964, 11, 827, 33

ORDINAL: second, second, first, first, first, first, second, second, second, second

ORG: the East Indian Railway Company, the Railway Company, the Railway Company, Company, Court, Court, the Railway Company, the High Court, Appellate Court, Court, Lordships of the Judicial Committee, Lordships of the Judicial Committee, Court, sham, Great Indian Peninsula Railway Co., Midland Railway Co., L.J. Ex, 2 H. & C., Court, the Madras Court, the Bombay Court, Court, Court, S.M. Railway Co., L.R

GPE: Bombay, India, N.S.

DATE: 1890, 129

PERSON: Schedule II, Schedule, Justice, Justice Teunon, Justice, Teunon, ho, Subordinate, Hiatunnessa Bibi v., Kailaash, Chandra Saha, Mitra, Justice, 4 B.H.C.R., Saminadha Mudali v., Kngbsh, Brunt

EVENT: the II Schedule

PRODUCT: Divisional Bench, 3 Ind. Cas

WORK_OF_ART: Ramratan Sukal v. Nandu 19 C. 249, L.T. 690, Schedule II

MONEY: no more than 5 or, 2 pence

FAC: Lakhmidas Hirachand v., Pundlik Udaji Jadhav v.

NORP: South Indian

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //