Mukundray K. Shah Vs. Director General of Income-tax (investigation) and ors.

Decided On : Apr-05-2004

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 132B, Section 132B, Section 132B, Section 132B, Section 132, Section 132A, the Expenditure-tax Act, Section 153A, Chapter XIV-B, Section 132, Section 132A, Section 226, Section 132, Section 132A, Section 132, Section 132A, Section 153A, Chapter X1V-B.Explanation.--, Section 1581J, Explanation 2 to Section 158BE.'8

PERSON: Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, Poddar, Gift, Poddar, Gift, Poddar

NORP: J.1

DATE: today, Today, 1974, 1241, today, 1957, 27 of 1957, 1987, 35 of 1987, 1958, 18 of 1958, 1974, 45 of 1974, the year, the previous year, thirty days, the end of the month, a period of, eight weeks

ORG: Additional Solicitor-General, Reserve Bank of India Bonds, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Collector of Customs v., Nicco Corporation Ltd., CIT, Pankaj Guljarilal Gupta v., Agrawal Warehousing and Leasing Ltd., CIT, Hariharnath Agarwal, HUF, Department, Department, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, these Reserve Bank of India, Reserve Bank, the Supreme Court, Collector of Customs v., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Collector of Customs, the Supreme Court, Nicco Corporation Ltd., CIT, Pankaj Guljarilal Gupta v., the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Agrawal Warehousing and Leasing Ltd., CIT, The Allahabad High Court, Hariharnath Agarwal, HUF, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Interest-tax Act, Assessing, Assessing, Tribunal, RBI, Tribunal, Tribunal, xerox

MONEY: 9 per cent, eight per cent

CARDINAL: 99, 7.2, 1994(73)ELT519(SC, 2001]251ITR791(Cal, 1995ECR654(Calcutta, 2002]257ITR235(MP, 1996]221ITR486(All, 1994(73)ELT519(SC, 6, 4, 2001]251ITR791(Cal, 1995ECR654(Calcutta, 2002]257ITR235(MP, 1996]221ITR486(All, two, one hundred and twenty days, 5, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, one hundred and twenty days

WORK_OF_ART: Collector of Customs, Collector of Customs

GPE: Bombay, Clause, Clause, Clause, Clause, Clause

ORDINAL: first, first