The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors. Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.

Decided On : Mar-22-1878

Court : Kolkata

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]Code Context

$shops2 = $shops['topics'];
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors. Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'LAW' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Section 4',
			(int) 1 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
			(int) 2 => 'Section 221',
			(int) 3 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
			(int) 4 => 'Section 220',
			(int) 5 => 'Section 221',
			(int) 6 => 'Section 220',
			(int) 7 => 'Section 220'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'L.S. Jackson',
			(int) 1 => 'J.1'
		),
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Court',
			(int) 1 => 'Magistrate',
			(int) 2 => 'Magistrate'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '871021',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '871021'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors. Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'LAW' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Section 4',
		(int) 1 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
		(int) 2 => 'Section 221',
		(int) 3 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
		(int) 4 => 'Section 220',
		(int) 5 => 'Section 221',
		(int) 6 => 'Section 220',
		(int) 7 => 'Section 220'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'L.S. Jackson',
		(int) 1 => 'J.1'
	),
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Court',
		(int) 1 => 'Magistrate',
		(int) 2 => 'Magistrate'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '871021',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '871021'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]Code Context//$shops = $shops['entities'];

foreach ($shops2 as $key => $val) {
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors. Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'LAW' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Section 4',
			(int) 1 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
			(int) 2 => 'Section 221',
			(int) 3 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
			(int) 4 => 'Section 220',
			(int) 5 => 'Section 221',
			(int) 6 => 'Section 220',
			(int) 7 => 'Section 220'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'L.S. Jackson',
			(int) 1 => 'J.1'
		),
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Court',
			(int) 1 => 'Magistrate',
			(int) 2 => 'Magistrate'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '871021',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '871021'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors. Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'LAW' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Section 4',
		(int) 1 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
		(int) 2 => 'Section 221',
		(int) 3 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
		(int) 4 => 'Section 220',
		(int) 5 => 'Section 221',
		(int) 6 => 'Section 220',
		(int) 7 => 'Section 220'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'L.S. Jackson',
		(int) 1 => 'J.1'
	),
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Court',
		(int) 1 => 'Magistrate',
		(int) 2 => 'Magistrate'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '871021',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '871021'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
$shops2 = null
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

LAW: Section 4, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 221, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 220, Section 221, Section 220, Section 220

PERSON: L.S. Jackson, J.1

ORG: Court, Magistrate, Magistrate