Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

P.K. Trading Company Vs. Income-tax Officer, k Ward

Decided On : Jan-16-1970

Court : Kolkata

LAW: the Indian Partnership Act, Section 226(3, Section 226(3, Section 226(3, Section 226(3, Section 226(3, Section 226(3, Section 46(5A, Section 226(3, Section 226(3, Section 46(5A, Section 226(3, Section 226(3, Section 226(3, Section 226(3, Section 226(3, Section 226(3

PERSON: K.L. Roy, J.1, Andrew Yule & Company Ltd., Andrew Yule & Co. Ltd., P. K. Trading Co., Andrew Yule & Co. Ltd., Nos, Nos, Andrew Yule & Co., P. K. Trading Co., P. K. Trading Co., P. K. Trading Co., P. K. Trading, Articles 14, Nandanandan Mishra, P. Rajeswaramma v. Income-tax Officer, Madras, D. K. Sen, Sen, Sen, Nos

ORG: the Union Bank of India Ltd., Dunichand Sons & Company, Calcutta, the Union of India, Bimala Devi Rateria, Jaidayal Rateria, Krishnakanta Rateria, Dewan Chand Rateria, P. K. Trading Company, Onkarmal Rateria, Appellate, Appellate, Jaidayal Rateria, Dewan, Rateria, Dunichand Sons & Co., Calcutta, Dunichand Sons & Co., the Union Bank of India Ltd., Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Jalan & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Jalan & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Calcutta, inter alia, Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Jaidayal Rateria, Dewanchand Rateria, Jaidayal Rateria, Dewanchand Rateria, Dunichand Sons & Co., P. K. Trading Company, Jaidayal Rateria, Dewanchand Rateria, Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co, Dunichand Sons & Co., P. K. Trading Company, Jaidayal Rateria, Dewanchand Rateria, Dunichand Sons & Co., M/s. Dunichand Sons & Co., M/s. Dunichand Sons & Co., the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Madras High Court, Mohamedaly Sarafaly & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., P. K. Trading Company, Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co., Dunichand Sons & Co.

CARDINAL: 4, 5, one, one, two, two, 18,231, two, two, 3,557, two, two, two, two, 1, 75,000, 1,30,000, 5, 1, 4, 5, 4, 5, 1, 1, 1, two, 1, 19, 2, one, two, 8, 15, two, two, 31, 39, 654, 1968, 68, 128, two, two, two, 11, 1, 2, 3

DATE: the 30th April, 1968, the 24th July, 1960, the 9th May, 1962, the 13th April, 1962, years 1962-63, the first year, 1963-64, February, 1967, the 29th February, 1968, the subsequent year, the earlier year, that year, the assessment, year 1962-63, the 27th August, 1969, the two assessment years, 1962-63, 1963-64, these two years, March, 1968, March 22, 1968, the 21st March, 1968, 1961, March 27, 1968, April 3 and 4, 1968, April 6 and 8, 1968, the 8th April, the 15th April, 1968, 1961, years 1962-63, 1963-64, two years, 1922, 1961, years 1962-63, 1963-64, 1957, 1960, quashed.10, four weeks

NORP: West Bengal, Central Circle III

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Calcutta, Act.4, Raterias

MONEY: 40 per cent, 20 per cent

ORDINAL: 7th, first, third, first, third

GPE: Clause, him.7, Jagannath Hanumanbux v.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //