Union of India (Uoi) Vs. B.C. Nawn and ors.

Decided On : Apr-02-1971

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 144, Section 156, Section 220(1, Section 246, Section 220(3, Rule 9, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 144, Section 220, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 222, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 144, Section 156, the Tax Recovery Officer, The Tax Recovery Officer, Section 220, Section 246, Section 225, Section 240, the Tax Recovery Officer, Rule 9, Section 231, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 224, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 224, Rule 9, Section 224(1, The Tax Recovery Officer, Section 224.4, Section 254(4, Section 256, Section 254(4, Section 265, Section 256, Section 156, Section 265 of the Act, Section 256, Section 256, Section 265, Section 256, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 265, article 227 of the Constitution by the Union of India, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 265, article 227 of the Constitution, Section 246, Section 222(1, Section 253, Section 256(1, Section 265, Section 220(6, Section 254, Section 144, Section 220, Section 222, Section 222, Section 254 the Act, Section 254, Section 220(6, Section 265 of the Act, Section 260(1, Section 265, Section 254(4, Section 265.16, Section 254(4, Section 220, Section 220, Section 265, Section 156, Section 220, Section 246, Section 252, Section 251(1)(a, Section 254(1, Section 265, Section 220, Chapter XIV, Section 265, Section 265, Section 220, Chapter XIV, Section 220(6, Section 255(5, Section 254, Section 254, Section 220(6, Section 265, Order 41, Rule 5

NORP: J.1, S.C, West Bengal III

ORG: the Union of India, B.C. Nawn & Bros., Appellate, the Union of India, Appellate, the Supreme Court, Appellate, Appellate Tribunal, Certificate, Schedule II, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Sections 226, Legal Maxims, Crawford, the Interpretation of Statutes, the Commissioner of Presidency Division, Brothers Private Ltd., Appellate, Appellate, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, inter alia, Divisional, court.14, III, the Divisional Commissioner ', Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, the Supreme Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Divisional, Divisional, Appellate, Divisional, Divisional, the Appellate Tribunal, Act, the Supreme Court, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Parliament, Sections 222 and Section 265, Crawford, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Lordships of the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, Divisional, The Supreme Court, Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Divisional

FAC: Certificate Case No, Lordship, Certificate Case No

CARDINAL: 659-I.T.(A)/68-69, 86, 156, 1, 3, 9, 6, 71, 815, 2, 4, 1(b, 222, 226, 227, 232, 227, 228, 232, 452, 335, one, 306, 1888, 21, 10, 68, 1969/70, 659, 2,48,658, 1,32,340, 86, two, two, 1, 156, one, 1961.20, 265, 252, 254, two, 435

DATE: 1961, July 11, 1969, October 14, 1969, 1969, 1969, 85, 1939, 1940, 52, 65, the 9th July, 1969, 1961, 20th January, 1970, 14th October, 1969, 11th July, 1969, 9th March, 1967, 13th April, 1967, 1961, 18th March, 1968, 6th December, 1968, 8th July, 1969, 9th July, 1969, 11th July, 1969, 19th July, 1969, 1961, 14th October, 1969, 27th November, 1970, 2nd February, 1971, 1961, 1961, 35 days

PERSON: jurisdiction.2, Cannanore, M. K. Mohammed Kunhi, existence.8, Pal, Brooks, Roy, J.10, us.11, B. C. Nawn, Nos, Balai Lal Pal, Pal, Pal, Pal, Cannanore, M. K. Kunhi, Pal, Pal, Nirmal, Kumar Mukherjee, Mukherjee, Mukherjee, Mukherjee, Mukherjee, Mukherjee, Cannanore, M. K. Kunhi, Mukherjee, Mukherjee, Mukherjee, Cannanore, M. K. Kunhi

PRODUCT: Rule 9, Calcutta, Sections 143 and 144 of the Act, F

ORDINAL: second, first, second, second, first

WORK_OF_ART: The Construction of Statutes

GPE: Colquhoun, C.A.

LOC: Act.12, Chapter XX, Chapter XX