Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commr. of Excess Profits Tax, West Bengal Vs. Ruby General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Decided On : Jan-11-1954

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 21, Section 66A(2, Section 66, Mooker-jee, Article 135 of the Constitution, Section 66A, Article 135, Article 135, Constitution, Constitution, Section 2, Constitution, Article 135.The, Article 135, Section 66A, Article 136.7, Constitution, Article 135, Constitution, Article 132 to three, Constitution, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 2, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 3, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 3, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 6, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Civil Procedure Code, Article 135 of the Constitution.10, Section 5 of the Act, Constitution, Article 135,11, Article 135, Article 133(1, Article, Article 133(1, Article 135, Article readwith Section 66A, Article 133, Article, Article 135, Constitution, Article 133 and, Article 134, Article 135makes, Article 135, Section 66A

ORG: Chakravartti, the Supreme Court, Court, Excess Profitst Tax Act, the Fire Insurance Fund, Marine Insurance Fund,, Accident Insurance Fund, Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Bench, Bench, Court, Court, Lordships, Lordships, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Excess Profits Tax Act, Court, the Supreme Court, the Federal Court, the Federal Court, the Privy Council, the Federal Court, the Federal Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, a High Court, Council, the Federal Court, the Federal Court, the Federal Court, Council, the Privy Council, the Federal Court, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, the Federal Court, Council, Federal Court', Council, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, the Federal Court, the Supreme Court, Constituent Assembly Act, the Privy Council, the Federal Court, Federal Court, the Government of India Act, the Federal Court (Enlargement of Jurisdiction, Council, the Privy Council, the Federal Court, the Privy Council, the Federal Court, the Federal Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court

PRODUCT: C.J. 1, a Full Bench, Rule 2, Article

DATE: 10-9-1953, 31-12-1939, 31-12-1939, the remaining two years, 1948, 1948, 1948, 1948, 1948, 1948, 1948, 1908, 1908, 1948, 1948, 1949, 1935, 1947, 1948, 1949, 10-10-1949, J. 17

NORP: Indian, Indian

CARDINAL: three, 31, 31-12-1941, three, 1940.The, Three, two, 2, 31-12-1939, 4, two, 22, 10-12-1953, 2, 2, 2, one, 1, two, 2, 133, 133, 134, two, 10-9-53, 2

PERSON: Rule, Bench, Justice Das, Mookerjee, J., Khaitan, Khaitan, Khaitan, Khaitan, Brothers, Madras, Khaitan, Majesty, Majesty, Khaitan, Majesty, Khaitan, Khaitan, Khaitan, Khaitan, apply.13, Khaitan, Khaitan, Khaitan, granted.15, S.R. Das Gupta

ORDINAL: second, first, first, second, first, first, second, first, second, first, second, third, second, first, third

GPE: Judges, West Bengal

LOC: Madras

TIME: 10-10-1949.It

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //