Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gleeson Vs. Virginia Midland R. Co.

Decided On : May-11-1891

Court : US Supreme Court

PERSON: Gleeson, Virginia Midland R. Co., Gleeson, Virginia Midland R. Co., Gleeson, Virginia Midland, Dorman, Ewart v. Street, Moffat, Great Western Railway, Bench Division, Tarry v. Ashton, Lush, Quain, L.R., Chamber, Kelly, Baron, Sanger, Gratt, Bennett, Stokes v. Saltonstall

CARDINAL: 140, 140, 287, 140, three, II, one, 5, three, 1, some fifteen, 12, 451, 2, 162, 10, 11, 24, 101, 2, one, 1, two, three, 1, 347, 6, 762, 15, 237, 4, 400, 524, 13, 181, 22, 341, two, 1, 2

ORG: U.S. 435, U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. 435, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Syllabus, the Supreme Court, the United States Post Office Department, Court, Bailey 157, Johns, New Brunswick Steamboat Co., Negligence 346, Kearney, London &c., Railway, Q.B., Virginia Central Railroad Co., McElroy v. Nashua & Lowell Railroad, Hutchinson, Railroad Co., Railroad Company v., Court, Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co., BREWER, J.

DATE: 1891, 1891, April 6, 1891, May 11, 1891, January, 1882, Sunday, the 15th of that month, Friday, Saturday, November, the previous August, two or three years

GPE: U.S., the District of Columbia, Washington, Danville, Virginia, N.S.

TIME: a few hours, two hours, the afternoon, morning

WORK_OF_ART: I. The burden

ORDINAL: first, first, third, first, first

PRODUCT: LAMAR

QUANTITY: twenty feet, several feet

PERCENT: 102 U. S. 577

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //