Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Omprakash Agarwalla Vs. Agricultural Income-tax Officer and ors.

Decided On : Jun-03-1970

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 53(1, Section 25(5, Article 226, Section 24(4, Section 24(4, Section 24(4, Section 24(1, Constitution, the Central Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3, Section 8, Section 8(1, Section 24, Section 25(5, Section 24(4, Section 8, Section 8(2, Rule 8, the Kerala Act, the Central Act, the Central Act, the Central Act

PERSON: K.L. Roy, Maidhandus Agarwalla, Maidhandas Agarwalla, Maidhandas Agarwalla, Maidhandas Agarwalla, Maidhandas Agarwalla, Maidhandas Agarwalla, Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, Sen Gupta, Schedule, Schedule, Ghose

NORP: J.1, Indian, Hindu, Indian, Hindu, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Hindu, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

ORG: the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Bagdogra Tea Estate, Bagdogra Tea Estate, Bagdogra Tea Estate, the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, inter alia, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Bagdogra Tea Estate, Bagdogra Tea Estate, the Bagdogra Tea Estate, Central, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Parliament, the State Agricultural Income-tax Act, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Supreme Court, Anglo-American Direct Tea Trading Co. Ltd., the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Central, The Supreme Court, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, The Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Central, inter alia, the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, the Supreme Court, the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, Central, The Supreme Court, Central, the State Agricultural Income-tax Act, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Central, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Supreme Court, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Central, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer

DATE: September, 1965, 1959-60 to 1964-65, the 2nd June, 1965, these various years, years, years, years 1960-61, 1961-62, 1962-63, the assessment year 1960-61, the 20th February, 1967, the year 1961-62, the 19th December, 1967, 1962-63, the 19th November, 1968, the assessment year 1963-64, 2nd January, 1970, the 8th May, 1968, the relevant year, the year 1963-64, the 31st March, 1970, the year 1963-64, 23rd December, 1969, years, the 2nd January, 1970, the year, 1959-60 to 1964-65, these years, the years, the 15th December, 1969, the 17th December, 1969, the 23rd December, 1969, each financial year, the previous year, 1922, a date later, 1922, 1961, 1922, 1968]69ITR667(SC, 1944, the previous year, the previous year, January, 1970, the relevant year

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, as to 60, 1, 1, 1, two, One, 1, 1, 5, 6, 7, 2, 3, 4, 8, one, 8(2, 24(1, 24(2, 23(4, 25(5

MONEY: 40 per cent, forty per cent, sixty per cent, Forty per cent, only sixty per cent

GPE: Siliguri, West Bengal, India

TIME: under that Act

PRODUCT: Rule 24

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //