Madanlal Chowdhury Vs. Income-tax Officer

Decided On : Feb-16-1972

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 148, the I.T. Act, Section 148, the I.T. Act

ORG: Sabyasachi Mukharji, HUF, Tribunal, ITO, HUF, HUF, Reliance, Division Bench, Reliance, the Supreme Court, HUF, HUF, Reliance, the Supreme Court, CIT, HUF, HUF, ITO, Sunil Kumar Banerjee, ITO, ITO, the Supreme Court, certiorari, certiorari

DATE: 1961, the assessment year 1957-58, November 14, 1955, December 31, 1955, January 1, 1956, November 2, 1956, 1968, 1961, six weeks

CARDINAL: 47, two, two, Two, 1965]55ITR406(Cal, 542, 1973]89ITR317(Cal, two, two, 1971]82ITR821(SC, 2, one, one, 1971]82ITR147(SC, 3.

PERSON: Surajmal Behadurmull, T.K. Basu J., Sewlal Daga v., Shyam Sundar Bajaj v. ITO, Kurban Hussain Ibrahimji Mithiborwala, T.K. Basu J., Srikishendas Ghanshyamdas, Srikishendas Ghanshyamdas, Sheo Nath Singh v. AAC

PRODUCT: Calcutta

ORDINAL: Secondly