Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shivram Poddar Vs. Income-tax Officer (Central) Circle Ii Calcutta and anr.

Decided On : Apr-27-1959

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 5, Section 34, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 34, Section 22(2, Section 44, the Indian Income Tax Act, Section 34, Section 22(2, Section 44, Chapter IV, Chapter IV, the Finance Act, section 44, Chapter IV, The Finance Act, Section 44, Section 44, Section 44, Section 4, the Indian Partnership Act 1932, Chapter VI, the Indian Partnership Act, Section 39, Section 25(3, Section 25, Section 44, Section 34, the Indian Income Tax Act, Section 44, the Indian Income Tax Act, section 44, Section 44, Section 44, Section 44, Section 44 of the Act, Section 44, Section 2, Section 4, Section 39, the Indian Partnership Act, Section 44 of the Act, Section 44, Section 44, the Indian Partnership Act, Section 39, Section 44, Section 44, Section 44 of the Act, Section 34

NORP: J.1, Baluchistan

DATE: the year 1947, 1950-51, February 1950, March, 1953, August 20, 1952, years 1949-50, 28-10-1952, 1922, the year 2004-05, the year ending 31-3-1950, 14-12-1955, March 28, 1958, 1949-58, 1922, 35 days, the year ending 31s6 March, 1950, August, 1958, 18-9-1958, 1958, 1958, 1958, 1958, April 1, 1940, March 31, 1944, the assessment year 1943-44, 1922, 25-11-1944, the year ending March 31, 1944, 1932, ' 4, a month

PERSON: Balmukund Radheshyam, Herewith, Balmukund Radheshyam, Lal Goswami, R.N. Bose, Manindra Lal Goswami, Balmukund Radheshyam, Balmukund Radheshyam, Shivram Poddar, Ramnarain Ojha, Netaji Subhas Road, Balmukund Radheshyam, Shivram Poddar, P.E. Polson, Meyer, Meyer, Meyer, Meyer

PRODUCT: Shivram, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, the 'Act', Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta

CARDINAL: 138, 357, 3-8-1955, 7A, 13, 22-10-1955, 0n, 16-12-1955, 23, 26, 1956]30ITR550(Cal, 1, 33, about 24, 33, 2, 1, 11, 3, 28-4-1958, about two, 3, two, two, 722, 723, 46, 47, two, two, two

ORG: Cross Street, Ratlam, the Income Tax Officer, the Income Tax Officer, the Income Tax Officer, the Second Income Tax Officer, the Central Board of Revenue, Income Tax Officer, Cross Street, Calcutta, Income Tax Officer, the Income Tax Officer, Court, the Appeal Court, Income Tax Officer, C/O M/s. Anandram Gajadhar, Court, Standing Counsel, Standing Counsel, the Indian Income Tax Act, the Judicial Committee, Income Tax, Bombay Sind, Standing Counsel, Standing Counsel, the Appeal Court, un, Dyes and Chemical Agency, Dyes and Chemical Agency', the Original Court, the Court of Appeal, Standing Counsel, Department, Department, the Indian Income Tax Act, Appeal Court, Standing Counsel, Court, Court

FAC: Kalbadevi Road, Netaji Subhas Road

GPE: Bombay, The1, Bombay, Manindra, follows:'44, Chakravarti, Sections

EVENT: the Indian Partnership Act, the Indian Partnership Act

ORDINAL: first, second

WORK_OF_ART: Lindley on Partnership' 11th edition

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //