Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/S Nova Ads Vs. Metropolitan Tansp.Corp. and Ors.

Decided On : Dec-12-2014

Court : Supreme Court of India

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 285, Central Act IV of 1939, Central Act IV, Section 203(1, Section 203(1, Section 214, Section 214, Section 129-A, Section 129-D, Section 129-A, Section 285, the Motor Vehicles Act, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 285-A, Section 285-B, Section 285-C(5, Section 203(2, Section 285-A, Section 203(2, Section 203(1, Section 285-A. Section 285-A, Section 285, Section 285-A, Section 285-, Section 285, Section 285-A, Section 285, Section 285-A of the Act, Section 285-A of the Act, Section 285-A of the Act, Section 285, Section 285, Section 204 of the Act, Section 285-A of the Act, Section 285-A of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution......"53

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION, Versus Metropolitan Transport Corporation And Ors, C.A. No.11038, C.A. No.11039, maladroit misrepresentations, Corporations, State, the Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., K.S. Kumar Raja & Another, M/s. Aim Associates, Chennai, the High Court, K.S. Kumar Raja, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, K.S. Kumar Raja, City Advertising Systems, Chennai, 31.3.2003, Dina Bhoomi, Chennai, K.S. Kumar Raja, W.P., Municipal Corporation of Chennai, Corporation, the High Court, Corporation, the High Court, W.P. No.26890/2003, Corporation, the High Court, Corporation, the High Court, the High Court, the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, Corporation, inter alia, Water Supply Department, Corporation, The High Court, Corporation, the High Court, K.S. Kumar Raja, the High Court, Corporation of Chennai, the Metropolitan Transport Corporation, the Commissioner Corporation of Chennai, The Corporation Council, Metropolitan Transport Corporation, the Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Council, the Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Corporation, the Corporation of Chennai, the Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, the Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Contract, Court, Arbitration, Petitioners, SLP, International Standard Bus Shelters with Advertisement Space, Standard Bus Shelters, SLP, SLP, AIM Associate Ltd., M/s, Front Line Media Etc, I.A. No.3/08, SLP, the Respondent Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Special Leave Petitions, SLP, the Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Limited, Special Leave Petitions, The Special Leave Petition, Chennai Municipal Corporation, Corporation, the High Court, Corporation, the Special Leave Petitions, Court, M/s. Aim Associates, M/s. Front Line Media, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Memo, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Hon'ble Supreme Court, International Standard Bus Shelters, Court, Court, the Metropolitan Transport Corporation, K.S. Kumar Raja & Anr, Special Leave Petitions, AIM Associates Ltd., M/s. Front Line Media etc.2, the High Court, Court, The High Court, Corporation, The Chennai Corporation, Court, Corporation, the High Court, Corporation, Corporation, the High Court, the State Government, Corporation, the State Government, Corporation, the High Court, AAG, the State of Tamil Nadu, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, The State Government, Corporation, the Central Government, the State Government, the State Government, Corporation, Corporation, The State Government, Corporation, State, Corporation, the Central Government, the State Government, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Council, Corporation, the Madras Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement, Taxes, Corporation, Council, Council, Council, Corporation, the standing committee, the standing committee, the standing committee of the Corporation, Explanation, the standing committee of any, the State Government, the Transport Department of the State, Corporation, Corporation, the State Government, Corporation, the State Government, the standing committee, the State Government, the Transport Department of the State Government.27, State, the Transport Department, the State Government, the Transport Department, State, the Transport Department, the Privy Council in Corporation of the City of Victoria V. Bishop, the Courts of Law, K.P. Varghese V. Income Tax Officer, Court, Corporation, Court, Sales Tax, Grenfell, Parliament, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Grasim Industries Ltd., the Privy Council, Court, Co. Ltd., Union of India, Institute of Chartered Accountants, Press Council of India[10], Corporation, State, Corporation, Transport Department of the State Government, Utkal Contractors & Joinery Pvt. Ltd., V. State, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Corporation, Corporation, the State Government, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the State Government, the State Government, No.14, Municipal Administration, Water Supply Department, State, the High Court, the Government of Tamil Nadu, G.O, Committee, Local Authorities, Bus Bay Spaces, STUS, the Municipal Corporations and Municipalities, The State Transport Undertaking, Recommendation No.109 of, Committee, Expert Committee, Local Authorities, Bus Bay Spaces, Government, State, State, the Commissioner of the Corporation, The State Government, the Transport Department, State, the State Government, State, Additional District Magistrate, the State Government, Act, the High Court, Corporation, Bench, Maruti Mali & Others[16, Equity, V. Punjab National Bank, Court, Court, India House, Corporation, Corporation, The High Court, Corporation, Corporation, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Uttar Pradesh, Court, the High Court, State Transport Department, Westminster Corporation V. London & North Western, State of Bihar V. Kameshwar Singh[27, State Transport Department, the High Court, State, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the High Court, the Commissioner of Corporation of Chennai, the High Court, Corporation, P) Ltd. & Others[28, State, Corporation, AAG, the State of Tamil Nadu, Corporation, State, the High Court, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, M/s. S.S. International, M/s. Front Line Media, Corporation, the High Court, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, UMESH LALIT, VERSUS METROPOLITAN TANSP.CORP, Respondent(s, Petitioner(s, Adv, Adv, Adv, Adv, Adv, Adv, Adv, Respondent(s, Adv, Adv, Adv, Adv, Adv, Adv, Adv, Dipak Misra, Bench, L&S

PERSON: C.A. No.11037, W.P.(C, Memos, Shri Ramasubramaniam, Order, Solomon, Nova Ads, Mohan Parasaran, C.A. Sundaram, V. Giri, Ravindra Srivastava, Rohtagi, Subramonium Prasad, C.U. Singh, Rohtagi, Rohtagi, Tamil, Grey V., Wensleydale, Ernakulam, Learned Hand, Bench, Madhya Pradesh, Tenterdan, B., Custodian of Vested, Deoki Nandan, Harbhajan Singh v., )"31, Shelter, Shelter, Chandra Yadav[12, B.K. Garad V. Nasik Merchants Co-op, Delhi Administration V. Shri, Kedar Lal Seal, another V. Hari Lal Seal[15]., Bose, J., V. Aba, Bench, P.M. Latha, Anr, Raghunath Raj Bareja, Anr, Muthaluru Bojjappa[19, Laxminarayan R. Bhattad v. State, Sita Ram, E. Palanisamy, Kishan N. Lalwani[23], Singh V. State, Amar Singh V. Union, Bench, Bench, Meerut V. Al Faheem Meat Exports, Subramonium Prasad, A.T. Mani, C.U. Singh, WP(C, B. Raghenth Basant, Liz Mathew, Shruti Iyer, Adv, V. Giri, Nikhil Nayyar, Ambuj Agrawal, Dhananjay Baijal, Akanksha, K.S. Natarajan, Ravindra Srivastava, K.S. Natarajan, Nikhil Nayyar, Dhananjay Baijal, Akanksha, Adv, V. Ramasubramanian, Shruti Iyer, Adv, Mukul Rohatgi, Jayanth Muth Raj, Corpn, Malavika J., Sureshan P., C.A. Sundaram, K.S. Natarajan, Nikhil Nayyar, Dhananjay Baijal, Akanksha, Subramonium Prasad, B. Balaji, R. Rakesh Sharma, R. Shase, Adv, Paramveer, Rajiv Dalal, S. Thananjayan, T., V. N. Raghupathy, Uday Umesh Lalit, A.T. Mani, Supp

GPE: OF2014(@, OF2014(@, Chennai city, Chennai city, I.A., Memo, I.A., India, India, India, India, Vancouver, Crawford, India, Orissa, STUs.36, law.41, Tudor, Kerala, Madamanchi Ramappa, Nasiruddin, Dalip, Nagar Nigam, Kumar

CARDINAL: 3 to 8, 3 to 8, 49,500/-, one, 20, 4, Rs.99,000/-, 40, 4, 02.2003 to 31.03.2005, 2, 500, 500, 30, 3, 30,000/-, 30.06.2008, 30.6.2008, 276/2007, 852/2007, 276/2007, 852/2007, 500, 500, 30, one, two, 500, three, 30.6.2008, six, 2(6, 2(7, 1939)], 203, 1, 2, 129, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 242, two, management.34, 109, STUs.3, two, 1, 2, two, three, 238, two, 19.01.2007, two, two, two, 276, 852, Rs.5, 12, 276/07, 8, 223/09, 276, 852, 1, 3, 4, 4, 6, 248, 9, 6, 3, 3, 2, 5, 3, 2, 5, 2, 1, 9, 2, 7 SCC69[26, 13

NORP: happen.3, MTCL, MTCL, MTCL, MTCL, "29, MTCL, also.54, MTCL

ORDINAL: 1st, first, first, 9th, first, second, first, first, second, first, 9th, second, first

DATE: one year, every year, next nine years, 2003, 5.9.2006, daily, 1919, 11.1.1983, the end of December 2006, the end of December 2006, 01.04.2005, 2007, 12 year, 13 months, every three years, 2006, the earlier two, 24.09.2008, 2003, 30th June 2008, the period of 12 years, every three years, 12 years, 12 months, 11.01.2011, 30th June, 2008, 2006, 30th June, 2008, documents.11, 12 years, 1959, 1959, 1939, three years, the meaning of 1939 Act, 1831, 1876, 19.1.2007, 10.3.2008, the last 40 years, the centuries, of.50, 12 years, two years, 12 years, 2007, 2007, a period of, eight weeks, today, 2014, today, 233/09, 2007, 2007, 1957, 6 H.L.C. 61, 1981, 2002, 1846, 1990, 1992, 1997, 2002, 1987, 1988, 1984, 2000, 2003, 2007, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2010, 2011, 1905, 2006

PRODUCT: forum".6

PERCENT: 10%, 10%

FAC: Royalty, Westminster Hall

LOC: Madras, Madras

QUANTITY: 129-F, 285-C(6

LANGUAGE: English

TIME: the entire Act

WORK_OF_ART: ORDER The Expert Committee on Transport Sector

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //