Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vysya Bank Ltd. Vs. Appropriate Authority of Income-tax and ors.

Decided On : Dec-24-1997

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 269UD(1, Chapter XXC, Section 269UD(1, Chapter XXC, Section 269UD(1, Chapter XXC, Section 269UD(1, Chapter XXC, Chapter including Section 269UD.22, Chapter, Chapter XXC, Chapter, Chapter, the Case No, Chapter XXC, Chapter XXC, the Land Acquisition Act, Chapter XXC, Section 269UA(iii)(B, Section 269UA(iii)(B, Section 269UD, Section 269UD of the Act, Section 5 of the Limitation Act

ORG: S. 269UD, Notice, Income Tax Act 1961, the Appropriate Authority of Income-tax, Delight Housing Corporation, the Central Government, inter alia, the Small Industries Development Bank of India, SIDBI, Allenby Road,, inter alia, inter alia, the Central Government, the Small Industries Development Bank of India, SIDBl, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, C.B. Gautam v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, Act, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, the Departmental Valuation Officers, The Supreme Court, C.B. Gautam v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, order.43, the Supreme Court, C.B. Gautam v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Section 269UD, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, C.B. Gautam v. Union of India, the Gujarat High Court, Shriniketan Members Association, Appropriate Authority, the Gujarat High Court, the Gujarat High Court, Laboni Developers v. Appropriate Authority, the Allahabad High Court, Ashok Kumar Sood v. Dy, the Allahabad High Court, Ashok Kumar Sood, CIT, the Supreme Court, Union of India, the Bombay High Court, Vimal Agarwal v. Appropriate Authority, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Supreme Court, Associated Cement, Appropriate Authority, Associated Cement Co. Ltd., Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, Bombay High Courts, Appropriate Authority, Section 269UD, the Allahabad High Court, Ashok Kumar Sood, CIT, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, the Departmental Valuation Officer, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, perverse.72, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI, SIDBI.78, the Departmental Valuer, the Supreme Court, C.B. Gautam v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Union of India, the Supreme Court, the Departmental Valuer, Section 269UD, Legislature, the Delhi High Court, Appropriate Authority, Appropriate Authority, Delhi High Courts, inter alia, the Supreme Court, C.B. Gautam v. Appropriate Authority, Chandrika Apartments Pvt Ltd., Union of India, the Gujarat High Court, Hindumal Balmukund Investment Co. Pvt Ltd., Appropriate Authority, Laboni Developers v. Appropriate Authority, inter alia

CARDINAL: more than 15, more than 15, one, 1961.2, two, 7, 16, 250, One, eight, 9,96,282.50, 25,00,000, 4,86,847.50, eight, eight, 7, 9,77,532.50, 27,37,091, two, 1,95,506.50, 12142{W, 1994.4, 7, 37, 1, 7.5, 1, more than 15, 7, 1, 1994.7, 734, 697, 18, 15, 340, 1, three, two, 734, three, 1994.11, 7, 7, 75,000, 200/250, 7, 7, 37, 1, more than 15, 38,41,507, 18, 340, 1, 340, 340, 613.80, 643.67, 1, 1994.15, 1, 1, 7, 1, two, 7.19, 1993]199ITR530(SC, two, 1997]223ITR572(Bom, 594, 223, two-fold, 196, 372, 1028.35, 1993]199ITR530(SC, 1, 1, 1993]199ITR530(SC, 539, 1993]199ITR530(SC, 1993]199ITR530(SC, 1993]199ITR530(SC, 1996]219ITR359(Guj, 1996]219ITR284(Guj, 1995]216ITR193(All, 1, 1995]216ITR193(All, two, 1993]199ITR530(SC, 1994]210ITR16(Bom, more than 15, more than 15, one, 1993]199ITR530(SC, 1995]213ITR288(Cal, 1995]213ITR288(Cal, 1993]199ITR530(SC, 1993]199ITR530(SC, 1994]207ITR743(Cal, 293, 1995]216ITR193(All, 705, 15, 15, 15, 37, 63, 15.3, 73, 2, 5, 83, 37, 4.4, 4, more than 15, 3.16, 3.18, transferee, transferee, 7, 689.47, 7, two, two, 1993]199ITR530(SC, more than 15, more than 15, 1993]199ITR530(SC, more than 15, more than 15, two, two, 1995]213ITR470(Cal, 1991]188ITR656(Delhi, 1993]200ITR773(Mad, 7, 34,96,282.50, 7, 4,88,847.50, 29,32,597.50, 5,000, 1993]199ITR530(SC, 1993]201ITR681(SC, 1994]206ITR272(KAR, 1996]219ITR146(Guj, 1996]219ITR284(Guj, eight, 7, 7, 1, 7, 7

MONEY: 15 per cent, 25 per cent, 25 per cent, 5 per cent, 18 per cent, 15 per cent, 15 per cent, 15 per cent, 15 per cent, 15 per cent, 5 per cent, 5 per cent, 2 per cent, 15 per cent, six per cent, six per cent, six per cent, three per cent, 1.5 per cent, 1.5 per cent, 15 per cent, 18 per cent, only 25 per cent, 70 per cent, 5 per cent, 5 per cent

PERSON: Banerjea, Netaji Subhas, Netaji Subhas, Chatterjee J., C. O. No., Netaji Subhas, Netaji Subhas, notice.27, Nagpur Bench, Nirmal Laxminarayan Grover v., de Smith, Pal, Gautam, C. B. Gautam, C. B. Gautam v., Pal, C. B. Gautam, C. B. Gautam, Pal, Krishna Kanoi v., Pal, vitiated.71, Bajoria, C. B. Gautam v., Pal, Bajoria, Dwarkanath Chatterjee v. Union, Satwant Narang, Naresh M. Mehta, Bhaskar Gupta, Gupta, Gupta, Rajalahshmi Narayanan v., Margaret Kathleen Gandhi, Tarun Chatterjee

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Calcutta 47, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Act.21, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Lordship, Bench, Lordship

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, third, fourth, second, first, first, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, first, first, first, second, first, second, first, second, first, first, first, second, second, first, first, first, third, first, first, second, first, second, first, first, second, second, first, first, second, first, second, first, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, first, second, second, second, first, second, first, second, first, second, third, fourth, first, second, second, third, second

DATE: April 21, 1994, 1994, May 27, 1994, April 21, 1994, July 15, 1994, July 21, 1994, July 22, 1994, July 23, July 22, 1994, 1028, 1028, 1028, August, 1994, July 29, 1994, 1994, August 19, 1994, September 28, 1996, May 27, 1994, September 1, 1994, 1961, September 7, 1994, September 15, 1994, September 16, 1994, April 21, 1994, May 27, 1994, 1028, March 31, 1994, 1028, September 15, 1994, 27th September, September 27, 1994, 1961, 42, 32, July 22, 1994, 1028, only a few days, '52, authority.57, 27th September, 1994, question.76, two months, March 31, 1994, April 21, 1994, May 27, 1994, February/March, 1994, May 27, 1994, one month, 27 days, the period of three months

FAC: Alipore Park Road

PERCENT: 15%, 15%

GPE: Gujarat, Gujarat, C.B. Gautam's, hereinbefore.81, Bench

NORP: Hari

LOC: Madras

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //