Lohia Mandilia and ors. Vs. C.E.S.C. Ltd. and ors.

Decided On : Jan-14-2003

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Consumer Protection Act, Section 20, the Indian Electricity Act, the Indian Electricity Act, Clauses 29, Constitution, Constitution, Section 24, the Indian Electricty Act, Section 26, Section 21(2, the Indian Electricity Act, the Indian Electricity Act, Constitution, Article in the Constitution of India, Constitution, Indian Electricity Act, Constitution, Section 20, Indian Electricity Act, Section 20, Section 20, Section 20 of the Act of, Section 20 of the Act, Section 20, the Section 20, Section 20, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, the Electricity Act, Constitution, Section 24, the Indian Electricity Act, Article 14 of the Constitution demand, Constitution, Section 21, Indian Electricity Act, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 24, The Constitution Bench, the Parent Act, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, Article, Article 14 : therefore, Article 14, Article 14, Article 12, Section 21, the Article 14 of the Constitution of India.42, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.45, Section 26(6, the Indian Electricity Act, Section 26, Section 26(6, the Indian Electricity Act, Section 26(6, the Electricity Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: ORDERKalyan Jyoti Sengupta, Kumar Ghosh, repair meter, meter fittings, Nemo, Ghosh, Anindya, Kumar Mitra, P.K. Roy, Ghosh, AIR1996SC2258 .8, Mitra, Ghosh, Invalid, Anindya, Kumar Mitra, Ghosh, Ghosh, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Delayed Payment Surcharge, Act.22, Ghosh, intrega, Articles 20(1, Articles 20(1, Ghosh, Improper, Mitra, Mitra, Bench, Tamil Nadu, Annadhi Anam, Mitra, Schedule, CESC, Sua, Mitra, Mitra, Mitra, Mitra, Tulshiram Patel, Ghosh, Haryana, Haryana Roadways of, Haryana Roadways, Deputy S. P., manner.44, and/or complainant, CESC, Mitra, Schedule VI, Schedule VI, Mitra

NORP: J.1, Rules, Rules, adequate.27

CARDINAL: two, 1, three, 30, 29, 50, 30, one, 1985)IILLJ206SC, 1991)ILLJ395SC, 30, 1998]2SCR620, 6, three, 1996]3SCR721, two, two, 15, 30, 1986)IILLJ171SC, 18, 30, 29, 0.5, 20, 1, 2, less than twenty-four, 1, 3, 1, 2, 29, 29, 29, 29, two, one, 29, 1998]2SCR620, 14, 1998]2SCR620, 29, 14, 44 and 50, 50, 1996]3SCR721, two, two, 2, three, two, 30, 1998]2SCR620, 43, 31, 1998]2SCR620, 30, 1985)IILLJ206SC, 84, two, one, two, 1605, 12, 141, 95, 10, 1998]2SCR620, 3, 3

ORG: M/s. CESC Ltd., Redressal Forum, Clauses 28, Government, un, Clauses 28, Magistrate, Clauses 28, un, Causa Sua, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, AIR 1985 SC, AIR 1986, Court, Wednesbery, Cal WN 396, Clauses 29, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Legislature, the Board under Section 49, the State Government, the State Government, Bartaman, Biswamitra, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, AIR 1997, SC, Conditions of Supply, un, the Supreme Court, High Courts, the Supreme Court, Central Inland Water Transport, Brojonath Ganguly, Supreme Court, Corporation, High Court, the High Court, the Scheme of Arrangement, Corporation, Corporation, the Supreme Court, Consumer Education & Research Centre, Clauses 28, FIR, Security Deposit, Security Deposit, Appellate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Clauses 28, The Supreme Court, Hyderabad Vanaspati Ltd., Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board, the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Hyderabad Vanaspati's, Board, State, Board, Board, Board, Clauses 28, Sections, Sections, Court, Court, Court, State of Andhra Pradesh, Mcdowell and Company, Supreme Court, Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act, the Supreme Court, Parliament, the State Government, the State Government, The State Government, Supreme Court, Court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State of, Court, CESC's, The Supreme Court, Clauses V & VI Schedule, Court, the Supreme Court, Hyderabad Vanaspati, Supreme Court, Board, Sales Tax, Board, Board, the Supreme Court, Board, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Board, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, Board, the Electricity Board, the Board of Directors, the Supreme Court, Union of India, Coke, Appeals, the Supreme Court, audi alterem, Court, State, State, State, State, State, AIR 1987, the Supreme Court, Government, Government, Government, Krishna Bus Services Pvt, State, the Supreme Court, the State Legislature, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Electrical Inspector, The Supreme Court, Electrical Inspector, the Schedule VI, the Electrical Inspector, The Electricity Inspector, the Electrical Inspector, Court, Court, the CESC Limited, Court, Electrical Inspector, authorizedofficer.51

DATE: 4th September, 2000 one, 1986, 29, 30, 15th May, 2000, 29, 1910, 39-44, 1910, 1416, 76-78, 2001, 1910, 1948, 1910, 1985)IILLJ206SC, 72, 84, 85, 86, 87, 97, May 15, 2000, 1910, 29, '17, 15th May, 2000, 29, 30 days, 30 days, 1910, 1910, 1910, '24, 1910, 44, 1995, '28, 1910, 15th May, 2000, 1998]2SCR620, 32, 29, '33, ancient days, the years, 114, '41, 1359, 1910, 1910, 1910, a period of, eight weeks, a period of, two weeks, today

TIME: less than 24 hours', 24 hours, hours, the hours, 12 hours, twenty-four hours, midnight

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Include

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India, 'The Officers of the Corporation

GPE: India, India, India, India, dispute.36, Roman Empire, Karnataka v. Shree Rameshwara Rice Mills, case.43, so.46

FAC: Hyderabad Vanaspati, Hyderabad Vanaspati, Clauses 29(d, Hyderabad Vanaspati, Hyderabad Vanaspati, Hyderabad Vanaspati

MONEY: 1998]2SCR620 .9, 50 per cent, 50 per cent

ORDINAL: first, first, third, first, first, first, first, second, second, first

EVENT: the Clauses 28, the Clauses 28, Clauses 28, the Clauses 28, the Clauses 28, the Clauses 28

PERCENT: 50%

LOC: Paragraph 39, Paragraph 27, Paragraph 44, Clauses 29(d