Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kapil Charan Nayak Vs. Gitanjali and ors.

Decided On : May-10-1951

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Order 1, Rule 1 of the Civil P. C. &

ORG: ORDER1, 2nd Court, Rs. 20 & on behalf, the Court-Fees Act, the defence contention &, Court, Hare Krishna Das v., Hare Krishna Das, Rs. 20 &, Subordinate

GPE: Midnapur, C.F., Subordinate, C.-F, Panchanam

PERSON: Schedule Ka, Schedule Ka, C.-F. of Rs, petnr, Schedule Ka, Schedule Ka, C.-F. Prayer Ka, Schedule Ka, Schedule Ka, Bepari, Rai Kshitish Bhusan, Horu Bepari's, C.-F. of Rs, Mukerjee, Sonamani Debi, A. I. R., C.-F., C.-F.

CARDINAL: two, 1, 2, 1, 2, 65, 65, 20, 65, 20, 65, one, 2, 20, one, two, only one, one, 73, one, 73, one, 73, one, 73, 20, 27, only one, 65, one, 1

FAC: Benamdars, Benamdars, the Patha H. C

DATE: 8-7-1950

MONEY: 1 & .2

WORK_OF_ART: Benamdars, Subordinate

PRODUCT: 1 & 2

PERCENT: 39 C. W. N. 1146

NORP: Hindu

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //